Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35171008›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2022

A Multiwell-Plate Caenorhabditis elegans Assay for Assessing the Therapeutic Potential of Bacteriophages against Clinical Pathogens.

Prasanth Manohar, Belinda Loh, Namasivayam Elangovan, Archana Loganathan, Ramesh Nachimuthu, Sebastian Leptihn

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Silver Nanoparticles fromMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  3. A comprehensive approach, based on the use ofCurrent research in food science · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Animal models ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  6. Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. The applications of animal models in phage therapy: An update.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Prasanth ManoharZhejiang University-University of Edinburgh (ZJE) Institute, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Haining, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Belinda LohZhejiang University-University of Edinburgh (ZJE) Institute, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Haining, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-4847-4622
Namasivayam ElangovanDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Bioscience, Periyar University, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
Archana LoganathanAntibiotic Resistance and Phage Therapy Lab, Department of Biomedical Science, School of Biosciences and Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ramesh NachimuthuAntibiotic Resistance and Phage Therapy Lab, Department of Biomedical Science, School of Biosciences and Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sebastian LeptihnZhejiang University-University of Edinburgh (ZJE) Institute, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Haining, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-4847-4622
Vellore Institute of Technology University · INPeriyar University · INSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNSir Run Run Shaw Hospital · CNZhejiang University-University of Edinburgh Institute · CN

Funding

Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Aric L Daul, Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
NIH HHS P40 OD010440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to establish phage therapy as a standard clinical treatment for bacterial infections, testing of every phage to ensure the suitability and safety of the biological compound is required. While some issues have been addressed over recent years, standard and easy-to-use animal models to test phages are still rare. Testing of phages in highly suitable mammalian models such as mice is subjected to strict ethical regulations, while insect larvae such as the Galleria mellonella model suffer from batch-to-batch variations and require manual operator skills to inject bacteria, resulting in unreliable experimental outcomes. A much simpler model is the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, which feeds on bacteria, a fast growing and easy to handle organism that can be used in high-throughput screening. In this study, two clinical bacterial strains of Escherichia coli, one Klebsiella pneumoniae, and one Enterobacter cloacae strain were tested on the model system together with lytic bacteriophages that we isolated previously. We developed a liquid-based assay, in which the efficiency of phage treatment was evaluated using a scoring system based on microscopy and counting of the nematodes, allowing increasing statistical significance compared to other assays such as larvae or mice. Our work demonstrates the potential to use Caenorhabditis elegans to test the virulence of strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, and EHEC/EPEC as well as the efficacy of bacteriophages to treat or prevent infections, allowing a more reliable evaluation for the clinical therapeutic potential of lytic phages.

Indexed as

Phage TherapyAnimalsBacterial InfectionsBacteriophagesCaenorhabditis elegansDisease Models, AnimalEnterobacter cloacaeEscherichia coliHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaeanimal infection modelbacterial pathogensbacteriophagesbacteriophage therapyCaenorhabditis elegansphage efficacyphage therapy

Identifiers

PMID35171008
PMCPMC8849058
OpenAlexW4220860640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.