Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35170986›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology reviews2022

Group B Streptococcal Neonatal Meningitis.

Teresa Tavares, Liliana Pinho, Elva Bonifácio Andrade

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Descriptive review: global spectrum of invasive group B streptococcal disease in nonpregnant adults: epidemiology, risk factors and clinical presentations.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. mBio · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Inhibition ofDentistry journal · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Teresa TavaresInstituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Liliana PinhoCentro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Centro Materno Infantil do Norte, Porto, Portugal.
Elva Bonifácio AndradeInstituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1941-580X
Universidade do Porto · PTCentro Hospitalar do Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonatal bacterial meningitis is a devastating disease, associated with high mortality and neurological disability, in both developed and developing countries. Streptococcus agalactiae, commonly referred to as group B Streptococcus (GBS), remains the most common bacterial cause of meningitis among infants younger than 90 days. Maternal colonization with GBS in the gastrointestinal and/or genitourinary tracts is the primary risk factor for neonatal invasive disease. Despite prophylactic intrapartum antibiotic administration to colonized women and improved neonatal intensive care, the incidence and morbidity associated with GBS meningitis have not declined since the 1970s. Among meningitis survivors, a significant number suffer from complex neurological or neuropsychiatric sequelae, implying that the pathophysiology and pathogenic mechanisms leading to brain injury and devastating outcomes are not yet fully understood. It is imperative to develop new therapeutic and neuroprotective approaches aiming at protecting the developing brain. In this review, we provide updated clinical information regarding the understanding of neonatal GBS meningitis, including epidemiology, diagnosis, management, and human evidence of the disease's underlying mechanisms. Finally, we explore the experimental models used to study GBS meningitis and discuss their clinical and physiologic relevance to the complexities of human disease.

Indexed as

Meningitis, BacterialStreptococcal InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalStreptococcus agalactiaeAnti-Bacterial Agentscentral nervous system infectionsGram-positive bacteriagroup B Streptococcusinfectious diseaseneonatal meningitispathogenesis

Identifiers

PMID35170986
PMCPMC8849199
OpenAlexW4212913372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.