Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35170813›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry2022

Risk-Based Prioritization of Organic Chemicals and Locations of Ecological Concern in Sediment From Great Lakes Tributaries.

Austin K Baldwin, Steven R Corsi, Owen M Stefaniak, Luke C Loken, Daniel L Villeneuve, Gerald T Ankley, Brett R Blackwell, Peter L Lenaker, Michelle A Nott, Marc A Mills

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Austin K BaldwinUS Geological Survey, Boise, Idaho.ORCID 0000-0002-6027-3823
Steven R CorsiUS Geological Survey, Middleton, Wisconsin.
Owen M StefaniakUS Geological Survey, Middleton, Wisconsin.
Luke C LokenUS Geological Survey, Middleton, Wisconsin.
Daniel L VilleneuveUS Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-2801-0203
Gerald T AnkleyUS Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota.
Brett R BlackwellUS Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota.
Peter L LenakerUS Geological Survey, Middleton, Wisconsin.
Michelle A NottUS Geological Survey, Middleton, Wisconsin.ORCID 0000-0003-3968-7586
Marc A MillsUS Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With improved analytical techniques, environmental monitoring studies are increasingly able to report the occurrence of tens or hundreds of chemicals per site, making it difficult to identify the most relevant chemicals from a biological standpoint. For the present study, organic chemical occurrence was examined, individually and as mixtures, in the context of potential biological effects. Sediment was collected at 71 Great Lakes (USA/Canada) tributary sites and analyzed for 87 chemicals. Multiple risk-based lines of evidence were used to prioritize chemicals and locations, including comparing sediment concentrations and estimated porewater concentrations with established whole-organism benchmarks (i.e., sediment and water quality criteria and screening values) and with high-throughput toxicity screening data from the US Environmental Protection Agency's ToxCast database, estimating additive effects of chemical mixtures on common ToxCast endpoints, and estimating toxic equivalencies for mixtures of alkylphenols and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). This multiple-lines-of-evidence approach enabled the screening of more chemicals, mitigated the uncertainties of individual approaches, and strengthened common conclusions. Collectively, at least one benchmark/screening value was exceeded for 54 of the 87 chemicals, with exceedances observed at all 71 of the monitoring sites. Chemicals with the greatest potential for biological effects, both individually and as mixture components, were bisphenol A, 4-nonylphenol, indole, carbazole, and several PAHs. Potential adverse outcomes based on ToxCast gene targets and putative adverse outcome pathways relevant to individual chemicals and chemical mixtures included tumors, skewed sex ratios, reproductive dysfunction, hepatic steatosis, and early mortality, among others. The results provide a screening-level prioritization of chemicals with the greatest potential for adverse biological effects and an indication of sites where they are most likely to occur. Environ Toxicol Chem 2022;41:1016-1041. Published 2022. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.

Indexed as

Polycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsWater Pollutants, ChemicalEnvironmental MonitoringLakesWater QualityPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsWater Pollutants, ChemicalGreak Lakes tributariesMixed contaminantsOrganic chemicalsPolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsSediment toxicityToxCast

Identifiers

PMID35170813
PMCPMC9306483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.