ArticleGenetic epidemiology2022
Integrating external controls in case-control studies improves power for rare-variant tests.
Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating External Controls by Regression Calibration for Genome-Wide Association Study.Genes · 2024Article
- Article
- Biobanking as a Tool for Genomic Research: From Allele Frequencies to Cross-Ancestry Association Studies.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Large-scale sequencing and genotyping data provide an opportunity to integrate external samples as controls to improve power of association tests. However, due to the systematic differences between genotyped samples from different studies, naively aggregating the controls could lead to inflation in Type I error rates. There has been recent effort to integrate external controls while adjusting for batch effect, such as the integrating External Controls into Association Test (iECAT) and its score-based single variant tests. Building on the original iECAT framework, we propose an iECAT-Score region-based test that increases power for rare-variant tests when integrating external controls. This method assesses the systematic batch effect between internal and external samples at each variant and constructs compound shrinkage score statistics to test for the joint genetic effect within a gene or a region, while adjusting for covariates and population stratification. Through simulation studies, we demonstrate that the proposed method controls for Type I error rates and improves power in rare-variant tests. The application of the proposed method to the association studies of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) from the International AMD Genomics Consortium and UK Biobank revealed novel rare-variant associations in gene DXO. Through the incorporation of external controls, the iECAT methods offer a powerful suite to identify disease-associated genetic variants, further shedding light on future directions to investigate roles of rare variants in human diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.