Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35170772›Full record

ArticleLasers in surgery and medicine2022

High energy, double pass helium plasma dermal resurfacing: A prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical study.

J David Holcomb, Vaishali Doolabh, Michael Lin, Edward Zimmerman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readCase ReportsMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04185909 (A Prospective, Multicenter, Single Arm Clinical Study Evaluating the Use of the Renuvion Dermal System for Dermal Resurfacing), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04185909 nacompletednot on this map

A Prospective, Multicenter, Single Arm Clinical Study Evaluating the Use of the Renuvion Dermal System for Dermal Resurfacing

TypeinterventionalSponsorApyx MedicalRan2019 to 2021Enrolled55ConditionsWrinkle, RhytidesArmsRenuvion Dermal System
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

J David HolcombHolcomb-Kreithen Plastic Surgery and MedSpa, Sarasota, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5402-9779
Vaishali DoolabhContemporary Plastic Surgery, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Michael LinAdvanced Dermatology and Skin Cancer Institute, Sherman Oaks, California, USA.
Edward ZimmermanAesthetic Revolution, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
Institute of Contemporary History · SISkin Cancer Foundation · USUniversity of Nevada, Las Vegas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA previous multi-center clinical study of low energy (20% power), single-pass helium plasma dermal resurfacing (HPDR) showed positive results but did not fully reveal the true potential of this novel technology. A second multi-center clinical study, reported herein, was therefore undertaken to evaluate efficacy and safety of high energy (40%), double pass HPDR for treatment of facial rhytids (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04185909).

methodsFifty-five eligible subjects seeking improvement in facial rhytids were enrolled for study at one of four investigational sites. All subjects underwent full-face HPDR treatment. The forehead, nose, cheeks, and peri-oral treatment zones were treated at 40% power with two passes whereas the peri-orbital and jawline/mandibular zones were treated at 20% power (up to 40% for jawline/mandibular zone) and one or two passes. Photographic images of the face were captured using the VISIA-CR system. Three-month posttreatment Fitzpatrick Wrinkle and Elastosis Scale (FWS) scores were compared to baseline scores as determined by blinded independent photographic reviewers (IPRs) and study investigators.

resultsBlinded IPRs and study investigators observed a ≥1-point FWS improvement in 100% of subjects with mean change in IPR FWS from baseline to the 90-day visit of -3.6 (±1.2). 96.4% of subjects indicated "improvement" in appearance at the 90-day visit utilizing the modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale. Evaluation of VISIA-CR data revealed statistically significant improvements in wrinkles, brown spots, and pore counts. Overall, 269 Adverse Events in 55 subjects were reported; most were mild-moderate in severity (99.3%), anticipated (86.2%), and of relatively short duration with most having resolved within 30 days (60.6%) of treatment.

conclusionTreatment of facial rhytids with high energy, double pass HPDR as detailed herein enables a marked improvement in FWS that parallels or surpasses competing technologies. VISIA-CR analysis demonstrates additional improvements in skin quality with statistically significant quantitative improvements in brown spots and enlarged pores as well as wrinkles. Effective rhytid effacement combines with high subject satisfaction and few unanticipated adverse events for a reasonable benefit-risk ratio.

Indexed as

Cosmetic TechniquesPlasma GasesSkin AgingSkin DiseasesHeliumHumansPatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesRejuvenationTreatment OutcomeHeliumPlasma Gasesfacial rejuvenationhelium plasmahelium plasma dermal resurfacingradiofrequencyrhytidskin rejuvenationskin resurfacingwrinkle

Identifiers

PMID35170772
PMCPMC9305223
OpenAlexW4213177867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.