Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35170676›Full record

ArticleMemorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz2022

Evaluation of LAMP for the diagnosis of Loa loa infection in dried blood spots compared to PCR-based assays and microscopy.

Thuy-Huong Ta-Tang, Pedro Berzosa, José Miguel Rubio, María Romay-Barja, Policarpo Ncogo, Diego Agudo, Zaida Herrador, Laura Cerrada-Gálvez, Agustín Benito

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Malaria diagnosis challenges andPathogens and global health · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Molecular surveillance detects high prevalence of the neglected parasitemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thuy-Huong Ta-TangNational Centre of Tropical Medicine, Institute of Health Carlos III, Malaria and Neglected Tropical Diseases Laboratory, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7058-4839
Pedro BerzosaNational Centre of Tropical Medicine, Institute of Health Carlos III, Malaria and Neglected Tropical Diseases Laboratory, Madrid, Spain.
José Miguel RubioNational Microbiology Centre, Institute of Health Carlos III, Malaria and Emerging Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, Madrid, Spain.
María Romay-BarjaNational Centre of Tropical Medicine, Institute of Health Carlos III, Malaria and Neglected Tropical Diseases Laboratory, Madrid, Spain.
Policarpo NcogoMinistry of Health, Malabo, Equatorial Guinea.
Diego AgudoUniversidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Madrid, Spain.
Zaida HerradorNational Centre of Tropical Medicine, Institute of Health Carlos III, Malaria and Neglected Tropical Diseases Laboratory, Madrid, Spain.
Laura Cerrada-GálvezUniversidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Madrid, Spain.
Agustín BenitoNational Centre of Tropical Medicine, Institute of Health Carlos III, Malaria and Neglected Tropical Diseases Laboratory, Madrid, Spain.
Instituto de Salud Carlos III · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESMinistry of Health · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLoa loa is a filarial species found exclusively in West and Central Africa. Microscopy is the traditional diagnosis method for human loiasis. Several molecular methods have developed as an alternative approach for identification of L. loa filarial parasites.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate a Loa-Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay to diagnose loiasis disease on dried blood spots (DBS) samples, compared to microscopy, filaria-real time-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and nested-Loa PCR.

methodsA total of 100 DBS samples and 100 blood smears were used for this study. DNA was extracted using saponin/Chelex method. DNA isolated was assayed by a Loa-LAMP assay in parallel to microscopy, filaria-real time PCR and nested-Loa PCR. The sensitivities and specificities of Loa-LAMP assay was computed comparing to each one of the reference methods.

findingsLoa-LAMP's sensitivity was more than 90% and specificity was nearly 100% when compared to molecular methods. On the other hand, sensitivity was decreased a bit when Loa-LAMP faced microscopy, but keeping the other statistical values high. MAIN

conclusionsLoa-LAMP is an appropriate method for loiasis diagnosis in endemic areas. Though, it has disadvantages like the reagents' high price at the moment and not to be able to detect more filarial species at once.

Indexed as

LoiasisHumansMicroscopyMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID35170676
PMCPMC8843042
OpenAlexW4211049399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.