ArticleCurrent gene therapy2022
Clinical Observation and Genotype-Phenotype Analysis of ABCA4- Related Hereditary Retinal Degeneration before Gene Therapy.
Article in Current gene therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deciphering the impact of ABCA4 genetic variants of unknown significance in inherited retinal disease through computational and functional approaches.Advances in protein chemistry and structural biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHereditary retinal degeneration (HRD) is an irreversible eye disease that results in blindness in severe cases. It is most commonly caused by variants in the ABCA4 gene. HRD presents a high degree of clinical and genetic heterogeneity. We determined genotypic and phenotypic correlations, in the natural course of clinical observation, of unrelated progenitors of HRD associated with ABCA4.
objectiveTo analyze the relationship between the phenotypes and genotypes of ABCA4 variants.
methodsA retrospective clinical study of five cases from the ophthalmology department of the People's Hospital of Wuhan University from January 2019 to October 2020 was conducted. We tested for ABCA4 variants in the probands. We performed eye tests, including the best-corrected visual acuity, super-wide fundus photography and spontaneous fluorescence photography, optical coherence tomography, and electrophysiological examination.
resultsDisease-causing variants were identified in the ABCA4 genes of all patients. Among these, seven ABCA4 variants were novel. All patients were sporadic cases; only one patient had parents who were relatives, and the other four patients were offspring of unrelated parents. Two patients presented with Stargardt disease, mainly with macular lesions, two presented with retinitis pigmentosa (cone-rod type), and one presented with cone dystrophy. The visual acuity and visual field of the five patients showed varying degrees of deterioration and impairment.
conclusionThe same ABCA4 mutation can lead to different clinical phenotypes, and there is variation in the degree of damage to vision, visual field, and electrophysiology among different clinical phenotypes. Clinicians must differentiate between and diagnose pathologies resulting from this mutation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.