ReviewMolecular ecology2022
Supporting in situ conservation of the genetic diversity of crop wild relatives using genomic technologies.
Review in Molecular ecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Refocusing the study of human-plant relations to the genus scale: Indigenous selection pressures in Xanthosoma.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2026Article
- Metabolic reprogramming and functional trade-offs during domestication of Sechium edule.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Genetic Diversity Unveiled: Cost-Effective Methods for Grassland Species.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- Identification of hotspots of crop wild relatives in Germany to promote their in situ conservation in a network of genetic reserves.Botanical studies · 2025Article
- The reference genome of an endangered Asteraceae, Deinandra increscens subsp. villosa, endemic to the Central Coast of California.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Article
- Crop-to-wild gene flow in wild coffee species: the case of Coffea canephora in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.Annals of botany · 2024Article
- Cutting edge tools in the field of soil microbiology.Current research in microbial sciences · 2024Review
- Evolutionary relationships, hybridization and diversification under domestication of the locoto chile (Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Genomic Survey of Flavin Monooxygenases in Wild and Cultivated Rice Provides Insight into Evolution and Functional Diversities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Finding needles in a haystack: identification of inter-specific introgressions in wheat genebank collections using low-coverage sequencing data.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Alternative Modes of Introgression-Mediated Selection Shaped Crop Adaptation to Novel Climates.Genome biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Supporting in situ conservation of the genetic diversity of crop wild relatives using genomic technologies.Molecular ecology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The last decade has witnessed huge technological advances in genomics, particularly in DNA sequencing. Here, we review the actual and potential application of genomics in supporting in situ conservation of crop wild relatives (CWRs). In addition to helping in prioritization of protection of CWR taxa and in situ conservation sites, genome analysis is allowing the identification of novel alleles that need to be prioritized for conservation. Genomics is enabling the identification of potential sources of important adaptive traits that can guide the establishment or enrichment of in situ genetic reserves. Genomic tools also have the potential for developing a robust framework for monitoring and reporting genome-based indicators of genetic diversity changes associated with factors such as land use or climate change. These tools have been demonstrated to have an important role in managing the conservation of populations, supporting sustainable access and utilization of CWR diversity, enhancing accelerated domestication of new crops and forensic genomics thus preventing misappropriation of genetic resources. Despite this great potential, many policy makers and conservation managers have failed to recognize and appreciate the need to accelerate the application of genomics to support the conservation and management of biodiversity in CWRs to underpin global food security. Funding and inadequate genomic expertise among conservation practitioners also remain major hindrances to the widespread application of genomics in conservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.