ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2022
Identification and molecular epidemiology of routinely determined Streptococcus pneumoniae with negative Quellung reaction results.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accurate serotype identification ofJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- An abundance ofMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2025Article
- First Genome-Phenome Characterization of Two NonencapsulatedInfection and drug resistance · 2025Article
- Article
- C-Reactive Protein: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, False Test Results and a Novel Diagnostic Algorithm for Clinicians.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Identification and molecular epidemiology of routinely determined Streptococcus pneumoniae with negative Quellung reaction results.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSome streptococci strains identified as Streptococcus pneumoniae (S. pneumoniae) by routine clinical methods exhibiting negative Quellung reaction results may belong to other species of viridans group streptococci or non-typeable S. pneumoniae. The purpose of this study was to investigate the identification and molecular characteristics of S. pneumoniae with negative Quellung reaction results.
methodsOne hundred and five isolates identified as S. pneumoniae using routine microbiological methods with negative Quellung reaction results were included. Multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) was used as a gold standard in species identification, and the capacity of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) in identification was evaluated. Capsular genes and sequence types of S. pneumoniae isolates were determined by sequential multiplex PCR and multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns were determined via broth microdilution with a commercialized 96-well plate.
resultsAmong the isolates, 81 were identified as S. pneumoniae and 24 were S. pseudopneumoniae by MLSA. MALDI-TOF MS misidentified six S. pneumoniae isolates as S. pseudopneumoniae and nine S. pseudopneumoniae isolates as S. pneumoniae or S. mitis/S. oralis. Thirty-one sequence types (STs) were detected for these 81 S. pneumoniae isolates, and the dominant ST was ST-bj12 (16, 19.8%). The non-susceptibility rates of S. pseudopneumoniae were comparable to those of NESp strains.
conclusionsSome S. pneumoniae isolates identified by routine methods were S. pseudopneumoniae. Most NESp strains have a different genetic background compared with capsulated S. pneumoniae strains. The resistance patterns of S. pseudopneumoniae against common antibiotics were comparable to those of NESp.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.