Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35170063›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2022

Transfer learning for data-efficient abdominal muscle segmentation with convolutional neural networks.

Dónal M McSweeney, Edward G Henderson, Marcel van Herk, Jamie Weaver, Paul A Bromiley, Andrew Green, Alan McWilliam

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dónal M McSweeneyDivision of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Edward G HendersonDivision of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Marcel van HerkDivision of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Jamie WeaverDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Paul A BromileyDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Andrew GreenDivision of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Alan McWilliamDivision of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute Phd Studentship C147/A25254Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council DTP StudentshipManchester Biomedical Research CentreResearch Training Support Grant (RTSG) via a EPSRC DTP Studentship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSkeletal muscle segmentation is an important procedure for assessing sarcopenia, an emerging imaging biomarker of patient frailty. Data annotation remains the bottleneck for training deep learning auto-segmentation models. PURPOSE: There is a need to define methodologies for applying models to different domains (e.g., anatomical regions or imaging modalities) without dramatically increasing data annotation.

methodsTo address this problem, we empirically evaluate the generalizability of various source tasks for transfer learning: natural image classification, natural image segmentation, unsupervised image reconstruction, and self-supervised jigsaw solving. Axial CT slices at L3 were extracted from PET-CT scans for 204 oesophago-gastric cancer patients and the skeletal muscle manually delineated by an expert. Features were transferred and segmentation models trained on subsets (

resultsWe find that accurate segmentation models can be trained on a fraction of the data required by current approaches. The Dice similarity coefficient and root mean square distance-to-agreement were calculated for each prediction and used to assess model performance. Models pre-trained on a segmentation task and fine-tuned on 10 images produce delineations that are comparable to those from trained observers and extract reliable measures of muscle health.

conclusionsAppropriate transfer learning can generate convolutional neural networks for abdominal muscle segmentation that achieve human-level performance while decreasing the required data by an order of magnitude, compared to previous methods (

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAbdominal MusclesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine Learningdeep learningsarcopeniasegmentation

Identifiers

PMID35170063
PMCPMC9313817
OpenAlexW4213021241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.