Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35169688›Full record

ReviewiScience2022

Machine learning for multi-omics data integration in cancer.

Zhaoxiang Cai, Rebecca C Poulos, Jia Liu, Qing Zhong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 175 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
175citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

175 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. A modular framework for antibody-drug conjugate biomarkers.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Genotoxicity of cancer therapies and the risk of secondary malignancies: toward personalized prevention.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Integrating multi-omics data for next-generation cancer research and precision medicine.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

115 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhaoxiang CaiProCan®, Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 214 Hawkesbury Rd, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.
Rebecca C PoulosProCan®, Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 214 Hawkesbury Rd, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.
Jia LiuProCan®, Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 214 Hawkesbury Rd, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.
Qing ZhongProCan®, Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 214 Hawkesbury Rd, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-omics data analysis is an important aspect of cancer molecular biology studies and has led to ground-breaking discoveries. Many efforts have been made to develop machine learning methods that automatically integrate omics data. Here, we review machine learning tools categorized as either general-purpose or task-specific, covering both supervised and unsupervised learning for integrative analysis of multi-omics data. We benchmark the performance of five machine learning approaches using data from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia, reporting accuracy on cancer type classification and mean absolute error on drug response prediction, and evaluating runtime efficiency. This review provides recommendations to researchers regarding suitable machine learning method selection for their specific applications. It should also promote the development of novel machine learning methodologies for data integration, which will be essential for drug discovery, clinical trial design, and personalized treatments.

Indexed as

machine learningomicssystems biology

Identifiers

PMID35169688
PMCPMC8829812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.