Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35169607›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2022

Re-treatment with PARPi in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: A single institutional experience.

Malak Moubarak, Philipp Harter, Beyhan Ataseven, Alexander Traut, Julia Welz, Thais Baert, Florian Heitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Olaparib-ResistantCells · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Malak MoubarakDepartment of Gynecology & Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.
Philipp HarterDepartment of Gynecology & Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.
Beyhan AtasevenDepartment of Gynecology & Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.
Alexander TrautDepartment of Gynecology & Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.
Julia WelzDepartment of Gynecology & Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.
Thais BaertDepartment of Gynecology & Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.
Florian HeitzDepartment of Gynecology & Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe aimed to evaluate real-life experiences with the re-challenge of poly(ADP-Ribose)Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) after a prior PARPi therapy in patients with recurrent EOC.

methodsA retrospective descriptive study was conducted at a tertiary care center of excellence for ovarian cancer. Demographic, pathological, and therapeutic data were collected for patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who were re-treated with PARPi in their therapy course.

resultsTwenty-nine patients were included in the study. Twenty-six patients received the second PARPi as maintenance therapy after two different lines of therapy and three patients received the second PARPi as upfront therapy after progression. Most of the patients (57.7%) were exposed to first PARPi after a second-line therapy. The median progression-free survival under the first and second PARPi therapy was estimated at 15 and 7 months respectively. PFS under the second PARPi after platinum-based chemotherapy was better after a complete remission with a median PFS of 8.5 months, compared to patients with partial remission (5.5 months). A better PFS was noted in case of negative

conclusionReal-life data support prospective evidence that patients with recurrent EOC may derive benefit of the re-treatment with PARPi in case of clear response to the last platinum-based therapy.

Indexed as

Epithelial ovarian cancerPARPiProgression-free survivalRecurrenceRe-treatment

Identifiers

PMID35169607
PMCPMC8829558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.