Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35169450›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2022

Optimizing trilateration estimates for tracking fine-scale movement of wildlife using automated radio telemetry networks.

Kristina L Paxton, Kayla M Baker, Zia B Crytser, Ray Mark P Guinto, Kevin W Brinck, Haldre S Rogers, Eben H Paxton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. High spatial pair cohesion during and after breeding in a socially monogamous territorial passerine.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kristina L PaxtonHawai'i Cooperative Studies Unit University of Hawai'i Hilo Hawai'i National Park Hawaii USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2321-5090
Kayla M BakerDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology Iowa State University Ames Iowa USA.
Zia B CrytserDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology Iowa State University Ames Iowa USA.
Ray Mark P GuintoU.S. Geological Survey Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center Hawai'i National Park Hawaii USA.
Kevin W BrinckHawai'i Cooperative Studies Unit University of Hawai'i Hilo Hawai'i National Park Hawaii USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7581-2482
Haldre S RogersDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology Iowa State University Ames Iowa USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4763-5006
Eben H PaxtonU.S. Geological Survey Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center Hawai'i National Park Hawaii USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5578-7689

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major advancement in the use of radio telemetry has been the development of automated radio tracking systems (ARTS), which allow animal movements to be tracked continuously. A new ARTS approach is the use of a network of simple radio receivers (nodes) that collect radio signal strength (RSS) values from animal-borne radio transmitters. However, the use of RSS-based localization methods in wildlife tracking research is new, and analytical approaches critical for determining high-quality location data have lagged behind technological developments. We present an analytical approach to optimize RSS-based localization estimates for a node network designed to track fine-scale animal movements in a localized area. Specifically, we test the application of analytical filters (signal strength, distance among nodes) to data from real and simulated node networks that differ in the density and configuration of nodes. We evaluate how different filters and network configurations (density and regularity of node spacing) may influence the accuracy of RSS-based localization estimates. Overall, the use of signal strength and distance-based filters resulted in a 3- to 9-fold increase in median accuracy of location estimates over unfiltered estimates, with the most stringent filters providing location estimates with a median accuracy ranging from 28 to 73 m depending on the configuration and spacing of the node network. We found that distance filters performed significantly better than RSS filters for networks with evenly spaced nodes, but the advantage diminished when nodes were less uniformly spaced within a network. Our results not only provide analytical approaches to greatly increase the accuracy of RSS-based localization estimates, as well as the computer code to do so, but also provide guidance on how to best configure node networks to maximize the accuracy and capabilities of such systems for wildlife tracking studies.

Indexed as

automated radio tracking systemlocalization estimatesmovement ecologyradio telemetry

Identifiers

PMID35169450
PMCPMC8831095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.