Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35169444›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2022

Titmice are a better indicator of bird density in Northern European than in Western European forests.

Mira H Kajanus, Jukka T Forsman, Maximilian G R Vollstädt, Vincent Devictor, Merja Elo, Aleksi Lehikoinen, Mikko Mönkkönen, James T Thorson, Sami M Kivelä

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mira H KajanusDepartment of Ecology and Genetics University of Oulu Oulu Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9105-6469
Jukka T ForsmanNatural Resources Institute Finland Oulu Finland.
Maximilian G R VollstädtDepartment of Ecology and Genetics University of Oulu Oulu Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6209-5955
Vincent DevictorISEM, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD Montpellier France.
Merja EloDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylä Finland.
Aleksi LehikoinenFinnish Museum of Natural History Helsinki Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1989-277X
Mikko MönkkönenDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylä Finland.
James T ThorsonNational Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA Seattle Washington USA.
Sami M KiveläDepartment of Ecology and Genetics University of Oulu Oulu Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6844-9168

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population sizes of many birds are declining alarmingly and methods for estimating fluctuations in species' abundances at a large spatial scale are needed. The possibility to derive indicators from the tendency of specific species to co-occur with others has been overlooked. Here, we tested whether the abundance of resident titmice can act as a general ecological indicator of forest bird density in European forests. Titmice species are easily identifiable and have a wide distribution, which makes them potentially useful ecological indicators. Migratory birds often use information on the density of resident birds, such as titmice, as a cue for habitat selection. Thus, the density of residents may potentially affect community dynamics. We examined spatio-temporal variation in titmouse abundance and total bird abundance, each measured as biomass, by using long-term citizen science data on breeding forest birds in Finland and France. We analyzed the variation in observed forest bird density (excluding titmice) in relation to titmouse abundance. In Finland, forest bird density linearly increased with titmouse abundance. In France, forest bird density nonlinearly increased with titmouse abundance, the association weakening toward high titmouse abundance. We then analyzed whether the abundance (measured as biomass) of random species sets could predict forest bird density better than titmouse abundance. Random species sets outperformed titmice as an indicator of forest bird density only in 4.4% and 24.2% of the random draws, in Finland and France, respectively. Overall, the results suggest that titmice could act as an indicator of bird density in Northern European forest bird communities, encouraging the use of titmice observations by even less-experienced observers in citizen science monitoring of general forest bird density.

Indexed as

citizen sciencelong‐term monitoringmacroecologyspatial Gompertz modelsurrogateVAST

Identifiers

PMID35169444
PMCPMC8840900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.