Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35169381›Full record

ArticleFood quality and preference2022

Changes in food behavior during the first lockdown of COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-country study about changes in eating habits, motivations, and food-related behaviors.

Elsa Lamy, Claudia Viegas, Ada Rocha, Maria Raquel Lucas, Sofia Tavares, Fernando Capela E Silva, David Guedes, Monica Laureati, Zeineb Zian, Alessandra Salles Machado and 19 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food quality and preference, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Changes in food behaviours during the first COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in Australia.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 18 institutions in 12 countries.

Elsa LamyDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences, School of Health and Human Development, Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture Environment and Development, University of Evora, Evora, Portugal.
Claudia ViegasH&TRC-Health & Technology Research Center, ESTeSL-Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, Portugal.
Ada RochaGreenUPorto - Sustainable Agrifood Production Research Centre/Inov4Agro, Faculty of Nutrition and Food Sciences University of Porto (FCNAUP), Porto, Portugal.
Maria Raquel Lucascenter for Advanced Studies in Management and Economics (CEFAGE), University of Evora, Evora, Portugal.
Sofia TavaresDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences, School of Health and Human Development, Center for Research in Education and Psychology (CIEP), University of Évora, Evora, Portugal.
Fernando Capela E SilvaDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences, School of Health and Human Development, Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture Environment and Development, University of Evora, Evora, Portugal.
David GuedesIscte - Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, CIS-Iscte, Lisboa, Portugal.
Monica LaureatiDeFENS - Department of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences, University of Milan, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Zeineb ZianBiomedical Genomics and Oncogenetics Research Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques of Tangier, University Abdelmalek Essaâdi, Tangier, Morocco.
Alessandra Salles MachadoUniversity of Vila Velha, Espirito Santo, Brazil.
Pierre EllsselUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, Division of Organic Farming, WG Transdisciplinary Systems Research, Austria.
Bernhard FreyerUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, Division of Organic Farming, WG Transdisciplinary Systems Research, Austria.
Elena González-RodrigoDpto. Economía y Finanzas, ESIC University, Pozuelo de Alarcón (Madrid), Spain & ESIC Business & Marketing School, Pozuelo de Alarcón (Madrid), Spain.
Jesús CalzadillaDpto. Economía y Finanzas, ESIC University, Pozuelo de Alarcón (Madrid), Spain & ESIC Business & Marketing School, Pozuelo de Alarcón (Madrid), Spain.
Edward MajewskiInstitute of Economics and Finance, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Ibrahim Prazerescenter for Advanced Studies in Management and Economics (CEFAGE), University of Evora, Evora, Portugal.
Vlademir Silvacenter for Advanced Studies in Management and Economics (CEFAGE), University of Evora, Evora, Portugal.
Josip JuračakUniversity of Zagreb Faculty of Agriculture, Zagreb, Croatia.
Lenka Platilová VorlíčkováCzech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, Department of Management, Czech Republic.
Antonino KamutaliFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade José Eduardo dos Santos, Huambo, Angola.
Elizabeth Regina TscháFederal Rural University of Pernambuco, Department of Management, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Keylor VillalobosFaculty of Land and Sea, School of Agrarian Sciences, National University of Costa Rica, Avenida 1, Calle 9 Heredia 86, 3000, Costa Rica.
Rasa ŽelvytėDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, Veterinary Faculty, Veterinary Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Ingrida MonkevicieneDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, Veterinary Faculty, Veterinary Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Jalila ElatiLaboratory SURVEN, National Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology of Tunis, Tunisia.
Ana Maria de Souza PintoUNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Brazil.
Paula Midori CasteloUNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Brazil.
Stephanie Anzman-FrascaUniversity at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Division of Behavioral Medicine, Buffalo, NY, United States.
Consortium for Changes in Food Behavior – COVID-19
University of Évora · PTBOKU University · ATESIC Business & Marketing SchoolLithuanian University of Health Sciences · LTUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BRAbdelmalek Essaâdi University · MACzech University of Life Sciences Prague · CZInstitut National de Nutrition et de Technologie Alimentaire · TNInstituto Politécnico de Lisboa · PTIscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa · PTJacobs (United States) · USUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Vila Velha · BRUniversidad Nacional · CRUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Zagreb · HRWarsaw University of Life Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in severe, unprecedented changes affecting the world population. Restrictions in mobility, social distancing measures, and the persistent social alarm, during the first period of pandemic, resulted in dramatic lifestyle changes and affected physical and psychological wellbeing on a global scale. An international research team was constituted to develop a study involving different countries about eating motivations, dietary habits and behaviors related with food intake, acquisition, and preparation. This study presents results of an online survey, carried out during the first lockdown, in 2020, assessing food-related behavior and how people perceived them to change, comparatively to the period preceding the COVID-19 outbreak. A total of 3332 responses, collected from 16 countries, were considered for analysis [72.8% in Europe, 12.8% in Africa, 2.2% in North America (USA) and 12.2% in South America]. Results suggest that the main motivations perceived to drive food intake were familiarity and liking. Two clusters were identified, based on food intake frequency, which were classified as "healthier" and "unhealthier". The former was constituted by individuals with higher scholarity level, to whom intake was more motivated by health, natural concerns, and weight control, and less by liking, pleasure or affect regulation. The second cluster was constituted by individuals with a higher proportion of male and intake more influenced by affect-related motivations. During this period, a generalized lower concern with the convenience attributes of foods was noted (namely, choice of processed products and fast-food meals), alongside an increase in time and efforts dedicated to home cooking. Understanding the main changes and their underlying motivations in a time of unprecedented crisis is of major importance, as it provides the scientific support that allows one to anticipate the implications for the future of the global food and nutrition system and, consequently, to take the appropriate action.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cross-country studyEating motivationsFood behaviorLockdown

Identifiers

PMID35169381
PMCPMC8830148
OpenAlexW4211166971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.