ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2022
COVID‑19‑related postponement of elective sexual or reproductive health operations deteriorates private and sexual life: an ongoing nightmare study.
Article in International journal of impotence research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of delayed elective urological surgery: A prospective observational study.BJUI compass · 2026Article
- The extended impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical imaging case volumes: a retrospective study.PeerJ · 2025Article
- Perioperative outcomes of penile prosthesis implantation in Germany: results from the GRAND study.International journal of impotence research · 2024Article
- The effect of hospital caseload on perioperative mortality, morbidity and costs in bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy: results of the German nationwide inpatient data.World journal of urology · 2024Article
- Elective surgeries during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: Case burden and physician shortage concerns.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to assess the impact of postponing sexual or reproductive health surgeries on patients' psychosocial distress and personal or occupational life during the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 77 elective sexual or reproductive health surgeries were postponed. Of them, 38 patients are still on the waiting list for an appointment and, despite our efforts, we managed to operate only 39 patients when operation capacity returned to a normal level. At the time of surgery, all patients were requested to complete a 14-item questionnaire, assessing patients' perception of the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients marked the necessity of operation at the time of initial postponement as urgent and as highly urgent at the time of surgery. Due to the postponement of surgery, they reported experiencing severe restrictions in private life and more concerns and worries for their disease. Interestingly, patients who could not perform sexual intercourse due to the underlying disease wanted to receive surgery more urgently (p = 0.001) and displayed more restrictions in private life (p = 0.007). On the contrary, the duration of surgery postponement was not associated with worse outcomes. Overall, postponement of surgery poses a huge psychological burden that leads to further personal restrictions. Patients that cannot perform sexual intercourse should be prioritized for treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.