ArticleScientific reports2022
Comparison of different surgical methods and strategies for inguinal lymph node dissection in patients with penile cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the density of lymph node metastasis in various inguinal regions of penile cancer using the nine-section method: A prospective study.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Penile cancer and lymph node management: a call for standardization.International urology and nephrology · 2026Review
- Video-endoscopic versus open inguinal lymphadenectomy: Long-term oncological outcomes in penile cancer.BJUI compass · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
- Risk factors for postoperative surgical complications after inguinal lymph node dissection in penile cancer patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Minimally Invasive Management of Inguinal Lymph Nodes in Penile Cancer: Recent Progress and Remaining Challenges.Cancers · 2024Review
- Complications and adverse events in lymphadenectomy of the inguinal area: worldwide expert consensus.BJS open · 2024Article
- Video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) oncological and surgical benefits compared to open inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND).Journal of men's health · 2024Article
- Factor associated with postoperative complications of inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer Test.Urology annalsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To compare the clinical feasibility and oncological outcome of different surgical techniques for inguinal lymphadenectomy (ILND) in patients suffering from penile cancer. This study included data from 109 cN
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.