Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35169227›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Telling functional networks apart using ranked network features stability.

Massimiliano Zanin, Bahar Güntekin, Tuba Aktürk, Ebru Yıldırım, Görsev Yener, Ilayda Kiyi, Duygu Hünerli-Gündüz, Henrique Sequeira, David Papo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Massimiliano ZaninInstituto de Física Interdisciplinar y Sistemas Complejos IFISC (CSIC-UIB), Campus UIB, 07122, Palma de Mallorca, Spain. massimiliano.zanin@gmail.com.
Bahar GüntekinDepartment of Biophysics, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Tuba AktürkProgram of Electroneurophysiology, Vocational School, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ebru YıldırımProgram of Electroneurophysiology, Vocational School, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Görsev YenerDepartment of Neurosciences, Health Sciences Institute, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey.
Ilayda KiyiDepartment of Neurosciences, Health Sciences Institute, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey.
Duygu Hünerli-GündüzDepartment of Neurosciences, Health Sciences Institute, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey.
Henrique SequeiraUniversity of Lille, CNRS, UMR 9193-SCALab-Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives, 59000, Lille, France.
David PapoDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Section of Physiology, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past few years, it has become standard to describe brain anatomical and functional organisation in terms of complex networks, wherein single brain regions or modules and their connections are respectively identified with network nodes and the links connecting them. Often, the goal of a given study is not that of modelling brain activity but, more basically, to discriminate between experimental conditions or populations, thus to find a way to compute differences between them. This in turn involves two important aspects: defining discriminative features and quantifying differences between them. Here we show that the ranked dynamical stability of network features, from links or nodes to higher-level network properties, discriminates well between healthy brain activity and various pathological conditions. These easily computable properties, which constitute local but topographically aspecific aspects of brain activity, greatly simplify inter-network comparisons and spare the need for network pruning. Our results are discussed in terms of microstate stability. Some implications for functional brain activity are discussed.

Identifiers

PMID35169227
PMCPMC8847658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.