Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35169166›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Using language in social media posts to study the network dynamics of depression longitudinally.

Sean W Kelley, Claire M Gillan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Anticipating depression trajectories by measuring plasticity and change through symptom network dynamics.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Language sentiment predicts changes in depressive symptoms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. "How" web searches change under stress.Scientific reports · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Sean W KelleySchool of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. sekelley@tcd.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4387-881X
Claire M GillanSchool of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. gillancl@tcd.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9065-403X
Trinity College · CA

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 204814/Z/16/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Network theory of mental illness posits that causal interactions between symptoms give rise to mental health disorders. Increasing evidence suggests that depression network connectivity may be a risk factor for transitioning and sustaining a depressive state. Here we analysed social media (Twitter) data from 946 participants who retrospectively self-reported the dates of any depressive episodes in the past 12 months and current depressive symptom severity. We construct personalised, within-subject, networks based on depression-related linguistic features. We show an association existed between current depression severity and 8 out of 9 text features examined. Individuals with greater depression severity had higher overall network connectivity between depression-relevant linguistic features than those with lesser severity. We observed within-subject changes in overall network connectivity associated with the dates of a self-reported depressive episode. The connectivity within personalized networks of depression-associated linguistic features may change dynamically with changes in current depression symptoms.

Indexed as

AdultDepressionFemaleHumansLanguageLinguisticsMajor Depressive DisorderMaleSelf ReportSeverity of Illness IndexSocial Media

Identifiers

PMID35169166
PMCPMC8847554
OpenAlexW4213318332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.