Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35169152›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Data-driven modeling and prediction of non-linearizable dynamics via spectral submanifolds.

Mattia Cenedese, Joar Axås, Bastian Bäuerlein, Kerstin Avila, George Haller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Precision non-invasive brain stimulation: anJournal of neural engineering · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Data-driven nonlinear model reduction to spectral submanifolds in mechanical systems.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mattia CenedeseInstitute for Mechanical Systems, ETH Zürich, Leonhardstrasse 21, 8092, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4337-418X
Joar AxåsInstitute for Mechanical Systems, ETH Zürich, Leonhardstrasse 21, 8092, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6840-9297
Bastian BäuerleinUniversity of Bremen, Faculty of Production Engineering, Badgasteiner Strasse 1, 28359, Bremen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2614-6190
Kerstin AvilaUniversity of Bremen, Faculty of Production Engineering, Badgasteiner Strasse 1, 28359, Bremen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7921-8234
George HallerInstitute for Mechanical Systems, ETH Zürich, Leonhardstrasse 21, 8092, Zürich, Switzerland. georgehaller@ethz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1260-877X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We develop a methodology to construct low-dimensional predictive models from data sets representing essentially nonlinear (or non-linearizable) dynamical systems with a hyperbolic linear part that are subject to external forcing with finitely many frequencies. Our data-driven, sparse, nonlinear models are obtained as extended normal forms of the reduced dynamics on low-dimensional, attracting spectral submanifolds (SSMs) of the dynamical system. We illustrate the power of data-driven SSM reduction on high-dimensional numerical data sets and experimental measurements involving beam oscillations, vortex shedding and sloshing in a water tank. We find that SSM reduction trained on unforced data also predicts nonlinear response accurately under additional external forcing.

Identifiers

PMID35169152
PMCPMC8847615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.