Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35168953›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Reward Value Enhances Sequence Monitoring Ramping Dynamics as Ending Rewards Approach in the Rostrolateral Prefrontal Cortex.

Theresa H McKim, Theresa M Desrochers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Complex functions of human lateral frontopolar cortex.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025
    Review
  3. What Does the Frontopolar Cortex Contribute to Goal-Directed Cognition and Action?The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Theresa H McKimDepartment of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912.ORCID 0000-0002-8501-6487
Theresa M DesrochersDepartment of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912 theresa_desrochers@brown.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7223-0556
Allen Institute for Brain Science · USBrown University · US

Funding

The neural basis of sequential control in human and non-human primatesP20GM103645 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI PAVLICK, ELLIE · 2013 to 2022
$22.9M
Brain Science Compute ClusterS10OD025181 · OD · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI SANES, JEROME N · 2019 to 2019
$600k
Brain Science Computer ClusterS10OD016366 · OD · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI DONOGHUE, JOHN P · 2013 to 2013
$600k
Integrative studies of the influence of reward on sequential control in human and nonhuman primatesF32DA045451 · NIDA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MCKIM, THERESA · 2018 to 2021
$205k
NIDA NIH HHS F32 DA045451NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103645NIH HHS S10 OD016366NIH HHS S10 OD025181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many fundamental human behaviors contain multiple sequences performed to reach a desired outcome, such as cooking. Reward is inherently associated with sequence completion and has been shown to generally enhance cognitive control. However, the impact of reward on cognitive sequence processing remains unexplored. To address this key question, we focused on the rostrolateral prefrontal cortex (RLPFC). This area is necessary and exhibits increasing ("ramping") activation during sequences, a dynamic that may be related to reward processing in other brain regions. To separate these dynamics, we designed a task where reward was only provided after multiple four-item sequences ("iterations"), rather than each individual sequence. Using fMRI in humans, we investigated three possible interactions of reward and sequential control signals in RLPFC: (1) with the visibility of sequential cues, i.e., memory; (2) equally across individual sequence iterations; and (3) differently across individual sequence iterations (e.g., increasing as reward approaches). Evidence from previous, nonsequential cognitive control experiments suggested that reward would uniformly change RLPFC activity across iterations and may depend on the visibility of cues. However, we found the influence of reward on RLPFC ramping increased across sequence iterations and did not interact with memory. These results suggest an active, predictive, and distinctive role for RLPFC in sequence monitoring and integration of reward information, consistent with extant literature demonstrating similar accelerating reward-related dopamine dynamics in regions connected to RLPFC. These results have implications for understanding sequential behavior in daily life, and when they go awry in disorders such as addiction.

Indexed as

Brain MappingPrefrontal CortexHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRewardcognitive sequenceexecutive controlfMRIprefrontal cortexreward

Identifiers

PMID35168953
PMCPMC8906790
OpenAlexW4212990417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.