Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35168940›Full record

ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2022

Disparities in cardiometabolic risk profiles and gestational diabetes mellitus by nativity and acculturation: findings from 2016-2017 National Health Interview Survey.

S Michelle Ogunwole, Ruth-Alma N Turkson-Ocran, Ellen Boakye, Andreea A Creanga, Xiaobin Wang, Wendy L Bennett, Garima Sharma, Lisa A Cooper, Yvonne Commodore-Mensah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Chicago Neighborhood Context and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Maternal Diabetes.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S Michelle OgunwoleDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA michelle.ogunwole@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9479-7695
Ruth-Alma N Turkson-OcranDepartment of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ellen BoakyeCiccarone Center for Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases, Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Andreea A CreangaDepartment of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Xiaobin WangDepartment of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Wendy L BennettDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Garima SharmaCiccarone Center for Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases, Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Lisa A CooperDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Yvonne Commodore-MensahDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common complication of pregnancy with implications for cardiovascular health. Among reproductive-aged women, less is known about nativity-related disparities in cardiometabolic risk profiles and GDM history. We examined how cardiometabolic risk profiles and GDM history differed by nativity and explored associations between acculturation, cardiometabolic risk profiles and GDM history. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsWe analyzed cross-sectional data from the 2016-2017 National Health Interview Survey among reproductive-aged women (18-49 years) who both reported ever being pregnant and answered the question on GDM history. Using multivariable logistic regression, we examined the percentage with GDM history and compared cardiometabolic profiles by nativity status and acculturation (duration of US residence).

resultsOf 9525 women, 22.5% were foreign-born. Also, 11.7% of foreign-born women had a GDM history vs 9.6% of US-born women. Foreign-born women with ≥10 years US residence had the highest age-standardized percentage with GDM history (11.0%) compared with US-born women (9.2%) and foreign-born women with <10 years US residence (6.7%). US-born women had a higher prevalence of hypertension, current smoking, and alcohol use than foreign-born women. Among foreign-born women, those with ≥10 years US residence had a higher prevalence of hypertension, current smoking, and alcohol use than those with <10 years US residence. In the fully adjusted model, foreign-born women with ≥10 years US residence had higher odds of GDM history than US-born women (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.17 to 1.76) while foreign-born women with <10 years US residence and US-born women has similar odds of GDM history.

conclusionsGreater duration of US residence may be associated with nativity-related disparities in GDM. Acculturation, including changing health-related behaviors may explain the disparities among foreign-born women and should be further investigated to appropriately target interventions to prevent GDM and future cardiometabolic diseases.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalEmigrants and ImmigrantsHypertensionAcculturationAdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancydiabetesgestationalhealth behaviorhealthcare disparitiespregnancy

Identifiers

PMID35168940
PMCPMC8852664
OpenAlexW4213252042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.