Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35168660›Full record

ArticleJournal of eating disorders2022

Multiple perspectives and dialogue in understanding experiences of living with eating disorders: Two narratives-four unpackings.

Berit Støre Brinchmann, Siri Lyngmo, Sine Maria Herholdt-Lomholdt, Bodil H Blix

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Berit Støre BrinchmannThe Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, 8026, Bodø, Norway. berit.s.brinchmann@Nord.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6541-4931
Siri LyngmoRegional Centre for Eating Disorders, Nordland Hospital, 8076, Bodø, Norway.
Sine Maria Herholdt-LomholdtThe Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, 8026, Bodø, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2438-0653
Bodil H BlixDepartment of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1049-4636
Nord University · NONordland Hospital · NOUiT The Arctic University of Norway · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis is a response to Conti et al.'s article, "Listening in the dark: why we need stories of people living with severe and enduring anorexia nervosa" (published in JED, 2016), and its call for relational metaphors and a relational approach to supplement the traditional medical/psychological diagnostic language used to describe the life experiences and complex emotions of people affected by an eating disorder.

methodsFour authors with different backgrounds unpack two narratives, 'The Prima Donna with the Green Dress' and 'Breaking down the Wall', both narrated during fieldwork in multifamily therapy. The narratives are unpacked from the perspective of a therapist within multifamily therapy, a researcher who conducted the fieldwork, a researcher based in phenomenology and a researcher based in narrative inquiry. The authors enter into dialogue with the narratives, and with each other.

resultsThe four authors focus on different elements within the narratives and understand them differently. One, focuses on strength and pride, and art expression as a different form of language for people living with an eating disorder. Another, on the experience of isolation, boundaries, and balancing openness and closedness. A third, sees the narratives as expressing a wish to see and be seen, and the fourth focuses on the absence of, and longing for, a shared space to explore.

conclusionThe aim is not to reach a correct or shared interpretation of the narratives but to explore how different perspectives may contribute to different insights, not only about one family in particular but about, more generally, the experiences of people living with an eating disorder. Our work shows the significance of engaging with multiple perspectives and dialogue as supplements to the traditional medical/psychiatric diagnostic language in both clinical practice and research.

Indexed as

DialogueEating disorderMetaphorMultiple perspectivesNarrative

Identifiers

PMID35168660
PMCPMC8848953
OpenAlexW4213343812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.