Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35168656›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health systems2022

Adapting the depression component of WHO Mental Health Gap Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG.v2) for primary care in Shenzhen, China: a DELPHI study.

Kendall Searle, Grant Blashki, Ritsuko Kakuma, Hui Yang, Shurong Lu, Baoqi Li, Yingying Xiao, Harry Minas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Kendall SearleGlobal and Cultural Mental Health Unit, Centre for Mental Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia. k.searle2@student.unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7448-5720
Grant BlashkiNossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Ritsuko KakumaLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HTE, England, UK.
Hui YangMonash Institute for Health and Clinical Education, School of Primary Health Care, Monash University, Notting Hill, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Shurong LuNossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Baoqi LiShenzhen Guangming Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Bao'an District, Shenzhen, 518107, China.
Yingying XiaoShenzhen Guangming Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Bao'an District, Shenzhen, 518107, China.
Harry MinasGlobal and Cultural Mental Health Unit, Centre for Mental Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUShenzhen Bao'an District People's Hospital · CNMental Health Research Institute · AUMonash University · AUUniversity of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care doctors in Shenzhen, China are increasingly expected to identify and prevent depressive disorder; however, they have received limited mental health training and community healthcare centres (CHC) do not provide standardised protocols for the diagnosis and care of depressive disorder. The World Health Organization's mental health gap intervention guide, version 2 (mhGAP-IG.v2) is a decision support tool for non-specialists for the assessment, management and follow-up of mental, neurological and substance use disorders (including depressive disorder). Given that mhGAP-IG.v2 is a generic tool, it requires adaptation to take account of cultural differences in depression presentation and unique characteristics of China's emergent mental health system.

methodsA two-round, web-based, Delphi survey was conducted. A panel of primary care doctors from Shenzhen, were invited to score their level of agreement with 199 statements (arranged across 10 domains) proposing changes to the content and structure of mhGAP-IG.v2 for use in Shenzhen. Consensus was predefined as 80% panelists providing a rating of either "somewhat agree/definitely agree", or "definitely disagree/somewhat disagree" on a five-point scale for agreement.

results79% of statements received consensus with a mean score of 4.26 (i.e. "somewhat agree"). Agreed adaptations for mhGAP-IG.v2 included:- an assessment approach which considers a broader spectrum of depression symptoms and reflects the life course of disease; incorporating guidance for screening tool usage; clarifying physicians' roles and including referral pathways for intersectorial care with strong family involvement; aligning drug treatment with national formularies; stronger emphasis of suicide prevention throughout all sections of the guide; contextualizing health education; reflecting a person-centred approach to care. Panelists chose to maintain diagnostic and treatment advice for bipolar patients experiencing a depressive episode as in the current guide.

conclusionsAn adapted mhGAP-IG.v2 for depression recognises China's cultural and contextual needs for assessment guidance; unique primary healthcare system organization, priorities and treatment availability; and diverse psychosocial educational needs. An adapted mhGAP-IG.v2 could both inform the future training programs for primary care in Shenzhen and also offer an additional mental health resource for non-specialists in other countries.

Indexed as

AdaptationChinaConceptualisationDelphiDepressive disorderIntersectorial careMental health gap intervention guide (mhGAP-IG.v2)Primary careShenzhenWorld Health Organization (WHO)

Identifiers

PMID35168656
PMCPMC8845283
OpenAlexW4212991690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.