Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35168546›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2022

Working in a care home during the COVID-19 pandemic: How has the pandemic changed working practices? A qualitative study.

Kerry Hanna, Clarissa Giebel, Jacqueline Cannon, Justine Shenton, Stephen Mason, Hilary Tetlow, Paul Marlow, Manoj Rajagopal, Mark Gabbay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Barriers to accessing and receiving mental health care for paid and unpaid carers of older adults.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A Community of Practice to increase education and collaboration in dementia and ageing research and care: The Liverpool Dementia & Ageing Research Forum.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. The role of identity in the experiences of dementia care workers from a minority ethnic background during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kerry Hanna *Department of Primary Care, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. k.hanna2@liverpool.ac.uk.
Clarissa Giebel *Department of Primary Care, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Jacqueline CannonLewy Body Society, Wigan, UK.
Justine ShentonSefton Advocacy, Southport, UK.
Stephen MasonInstitute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Hilary TetlowSURF Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Paul MarlowNIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool, UK.
Manoj RajagopalLancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK.
Mark GabbayDepartment of Primary Care, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pandemic has significantly affected care homes' residents and families through the national visiting restrictions. However, less is known on the impact these changes have had on the care home workforce. The aim of this research was to explore the impact of COVID-19 on the working practices of care home staff, caring for people living with dementia.

methodsRemote qualitative, semi-structured interviews were conducted with care home staff caring for people living with dementia (PLWD) in the UK.

resultsParticipants were recruited to the larger programme of research via convenience sampling. Interviews were conducted via telephone or online platforms. This research employed inductive thematic analysis. Sixteen care home staff were included in this study. Three overarching themes were developed from the analysis that conveyed changes to the everyday working practices of the care home workforce and the impact such changes posed to staff wellbeing: (1) Practical implications of working in a care home during the COVID-19 pandemic; (2); Staff values and changes to the staff roles (3): Impact to the care home staff and concerns for the care sector.

conclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted the daily working practices of care home staff, with staff forced to adopt additional roles on top of increased workloads to compensate for the loss of external agencies and support. Support and guidance must be offered urgently to inform care home staff on how to best adapt to their new working practices, ensuring that they are adequately trained.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansPandemicsQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2Care homesCare workforceCOVID-19Nursing homesOlder peoplePandemicsWorking practices

Identifiers

PMID35168546
PMCPMC8845240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.