ArticleAnnals of medicine2022
Comparing the use of mathematical calculation to a measuring wheel to determine distance walked in three different course configurations of the 6 minute Walk Test in healthy adults.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Planning a Clinical Practice Guideline Revision for a Core Set of Outcome Measures in Adults Undergoing Neurologic Physical Therapy, Part 1: Assessing Dissemination and Scholarly Uptake.Clinical and public health guidelines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionA recent clinical practice guideline set forth recommendations for the administration of the 6 Minute Walk Test, including course set-up and using mathematical calculation to obtain the distance walked. In clinical practice and research, however, deviations from these protocols exist. PURPOSE: To assess for differences in total distance walked between use of mathematical calculation and a measuring wheel during three different course configurations of the 6 Minute Walk Test.
methodsFifty healthy adults (18 males, 32 females) completed this study. The mean age was 37.04 (13.76) years ranging from 23 to 61 years. Each participant completed three course configurations of the 6 Minute Walk Test: a 12-meter straight walkway representing the Academy of Neurologic Physical Therapy Core Set of Outcome Measures Clinical Practice Guideline protocol, a 30-meter straight walkway, representing the American Thoracic Society's recommended protocol, and a 1.2-meter by 12-meter rectangular walkway, of which the Core Set of Outcome Measures Clinical Practice Guideline was derived. For mathematical calculation, the total number of laps counted, and this total number was multiplied by the distance of one lap with any partial lap added. Additionally, a research assistant followed behind each participant with a measuring wheel to capture distance walked.
resultsFor all configurations, there were statistically significant differences between mathematical calculation and a measuring wheel, with mathematical calculation producing significantly less total distance. Additionally, there were statistically significant differences between all course configurations, despite the method of measurement.
conclusionAdhering to 6 Minute Walk Test protocols, including the method of measuring the distance, is imperative to accurately interpret results and compare to existing data.Key messagesDespite recommendations for standardized administration of the 6 Minute Walk Test, deviations exist, including the method of which to obtain the total distance walked; either by use of mathematical calculation or a measuring wheel.In three different 6 minute walk test course configurations, including the American Thoracic Society's recommended protocol and the Academy of Neurologic Physical Therapy recommended protocol, the measuring wheel resulted in significantly larger distances than use of the mathematical calculation.Despite the measuring wheel able to account for the turns during the 6 Minute Walk Test, it is imperative for clinicians to utilize standardized procedures such as using mathematical calculation, in order to accurately track progress and compare to existing data, of which mathematical calculation was used to derive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.