Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35167700›Full record

Trial reportPain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2022

The MOTION Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Objective Real-World Outcomes for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients Treated with the mild® Procedure: One-Year Results.

Timothy R Deer, Shrif J Costandi, Edward Washabaugh, Timothy B Chafin, Sayed E Wahezi, Navdeep Jassal, Dawood Sayed

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. What Is a High-Quality Randomized Controlled Trial?Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy R DeerThe Spine & Nerve Centers of the Virginias, Charleston, West Virginia.ORCID 0000-0001-8907-7730
Shrif J CostandiDepartment of Pain Management, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Edward WashabaughMichigan Pain Specialists, Ypsilanti, Michigan.
Timothy B ChafinVidant Roanoke-Chowan Hospital, Ahoskie, North Carolina.
Sayed E WaheziMultidisciplinary Pain Program,Bronx, New York.
Navdeep JassalSpine & Pain Institute of Florida, Lakeland, Florida.
Dawood SayedThe University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Cleveland Clinic · USFlorida Pain Institute · USRoanoke-Chowan Community College · USThe Spine & Nerve Centers of the Virginias · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study is to provide Level-1 objective, real-world outcome data for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis suffering from neurogenic claudication secondary to hypertrophic ligamentum flavum.

designThe MOTION Study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing the mild® Procedure (minimally invasive lumbar decompression; Vertos Medical, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA) as a first-line therapy in combination with nonsurgical conventional medical management (CMM) vs CMM alone as the active control.

methodsPatients in the test group received the mild Procedure at baseline. Both the mild+CMM group and the control group were allowed unrestricted access to conventional real-world therapies. Patient-reported outcomes included the Oswestry Disability Index, the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire, and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. A validated Walking Tolerance Test, the incidence of subsequent lumbar spine interventions, and the occurrence of adverse events were used to measure objective outcomes.

resultsSixty-nine patients in each group were analyzed at 1-year follow-up. No device- or procedure-related adverse events were reported in either group. Results from all primary and secondary outcome measures showed statistical significance in favor of mild+CMM.

conclusionsOne-year results of this Level-1 study demonstrated superiority of mild+CMM over CMM alone for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who were suffering from neurogenic claudication secondary to hypertrophic ligamentum flavum. Use of the validated Walking Tolerance Test to objectively measure increased ability to walk without severe symptoms provided evidence of statistically significantly better outcomes for mild+CMM than for CMM alone. With no reported device or procedure-related adverse events, the long-standing safety profile of the mild Procedure was reaffirmed. mild is a safe, durable, minimally invasive procedure that has been shown to be effective as an early interventional therapy for patients suffering from symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.

Indexed as

Spinal StenosisDecompression, SurgicalFollow-Up StudiesHumansLumbar VertebraeMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeChronic Low Back PainLigamentum FlavumLumbar Spinal StenosismildMinimally Invasive Lumbar DecompressionNeurogenic Claudication

Identifiers

PMID35167700
PMCPMC8992575
OpenAlexW4210954841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.