Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35167600›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2022

Risk factors for postpartum haemorrhage in the Northern Province of Rwanda: A case control study.

Oliva Bazirete, Manassé Nzayirambaho, Aline Umubyeyi, Innocent Karangwa, Marilyn Evans

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prenatal hypertension as the risk of eclampsia, HELLP syndrome, and critical obstetric hemorrhage.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Article
  7. The profile of patients with postpartum hemorrhage admitted to the obstetric intensive care: a cross-sectional study.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Oliva BazireteCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID 0000-0002-8476-3448
Manassé NzayirambahoCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Aline UmubyeyiCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Innocent KarangwaUniversity of Cape Town, Cape Town, Republic of South Africa.
Marilyn EvansWestern University, London, Canada.
University of Rwanda · RWUniversity of Cape Town · ZAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostpartum haemorrhage (PPH) remains a major global burden contributing to high maternal mortality and morbidity rates. Assessment of PPH risk factors should be undertaken during antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum periods for timely prevention of maternal morbidity and mortality associated with PPH. The aim of this study is to investigate and model risk factors for primary PPH in Rwanda.

methodsWe conducted an observational case-control study of 430 (108 cases: 322 controls) pregnant women with gestational age of 32 weeks and above who gave birth in five selected health facilities of Rwanda between January and June 2020. By visual estimation of blood loss, cases of Primary PPH were women who changed the blood-soaked vaginal pads 2 times or more within the first hour after birth, or women requiring a blood transfusion for excessive bleeding after birth. Controls were randomly selected from all deliveries without primary PPH from the same source population. Poisson regression, a generalized linear model with a log link and a Poisson distribution was used to estimate the risk ratio of factors associated with PPH.

resultsThe overall prevalence of primary PPH was 25.2%. Our findings for the following risk factors were: antepartum haemorrhage (RR 3.36, 95% CI 1.80-6.26, P<0.001); multiple pregnancy (RR 1.83; 95% CI 1.11-3.01, P = 0.02) and haemoglobin level <11 gr/dL (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.00-2.30, P = 0.05). During the intrapartum and immediate postpartum period, the main causes of primary PPH were: uterine atony (RR 6.70, 95% CI 4.78-9.38, P<0.001), retained tissues (RR 4.32, 95% CI 2.87-6.51, P<0.001); and lacerations of genital organs after birth (RR 2.14, 95% CI 1.49-3.09, P<0.001). Coagulopathy was not prevalent in primary PPH.

conclusionBased on our findings, uterine atony remains the foremost cause of primary PPH. As well as other established risk factors for PPH, antepartum haemorrhage and intra uterine fetal death should be included as risk factors in the development and validation of prediction models for PPH. Large scale studies are needed to investigate further potential PPH risk factors.

Indexed as

Blood TransfusionCase-Control StudiesFemaleGestational AgeHumansLacerationsMaternal MortalityPoisson DistributionPostpartum HemorrhagePregnancyPregnancy, MultiplePrevalenceRisk FactorsRwandaUterine Inertia

Identifiers

PMID35167600
PMCPMC8846539
OpenAlexW4213194613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.