Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35167396›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres2022

Nurses' Experiences of their Ethical Responsibilities during Coronavirus Outbreaks: A Scoping Review.

Elizabeth Peter, Caroline Variath, Shan Mohammed, Mikaela Mitchell, Tieghan Killackey, Jane Maciver, Conor Chiasson

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elizabeth PeterLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, Joint Centre for Bioethics, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8155-216X
Caroline VariathLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Shan MohammedLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Mikaela MitchellGerstein Science Information Centre, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Tieghan KillackeyGerstein Science Information Centre, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Jane MaciverLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Conor ChiassonLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, nurses have experienced changes to the moral conditions of their work during coronavirus outbreaks. To identify the challenges and sources of support in nurses' efforts to meet their ethical responsibilities during SARS, MERS, and COVID-19 outbreaks a scoping review design was chosen. A search was conducted for eligible studies in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase and Embase Classic, EBSCO CINAHL Plus, OVID APA PsycInfo, ProQuest ASSIA, and ProQuest Sociological Abstracts on August 19, 2020 and November 9, 2020. The PRISMA-ScR checklist was used to ensure rigor. A total of 5204 records were identified of which 41 studies were included. Three themes were identified related challenges in meeting ethical responsibilities: 1) substandard care, 2) impeded relationships, 3) organizational and system responses and six themes relating to sources of support: 1) team and supervisor relationships, 2) organizational change leading to improved patient care, 3) speaking out, 4) finding meaning, 5) responses by patients and the public, 6) self-care strategies.Our review revealed how substandard care and public health measures resulted in nurses not being fully able to meet their ethical responsibilities of care. These included the visitation policies that impeded the support of patients by nurses and families, particularly with respect to face-to-face relationships. Organizational and system responses to the evolving outbreaks, such as inadequate staffing, also contributed to these challenges. Supportive relationships with colleagues and supervisors, however, were very beneficial, along with positive responses from patients and the public.

Indexed as

COVID-19NursesDisease OutbreaksHumansMoralscareCOVID-19Ethicsfeminist ethicsnursesreview

Identifiers

PMID35167396
PMCPMC9379388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.