Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35167034›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2022

Thunderclap Headache in Children and Adolescents.

Yoel Levinsky, Tal Eidlitz-Markus

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yoel LevinskyPediatrics B Department, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petach Tikva, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5841-6664
Tal Eidlitz-MarkusSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. eidlitz@tauex.tau.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3969-8664
Tel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis work aimed to review the epidemiology, clinical criteria, and primary and secondary diagnoses of pediatric thunderclap headache and to compare to adult thunderclap headache. RECENT

findingsThunderclap headache among children aged 6-18 years are rare; this headache presented in 0.08% of the patients admitted to a pediatric emergency department in a tertiary pediatric center. In that recent single-center study, thunderclap was a headache of grade 10 on the pain scale and conferred a benign course. Contrary to adults, in children, most thunderclap headaches are due to either a primary thunderclap headache or another type of primary headache. A number of case reports have attributed pediatric thunderclap to reversible vasoconstriction syndrome and bleeding due to intracranial aneurysm. However, 3-year data from a pediatric emergency department of one center did not find these reasons to be causes of secondary thunderclap headache. This may be due to the rarity of these diagnoses in children compared to adults. Four of the 19 patients with thunderclap headache reported in that single study had secondary thunderclap; the causes were infection in three and malignant hypertension in one. All the patients had a benign course. Although urgent imaging and lumbar puncture are required in the workup of pediatric thunderclap, severe causes are very rare. More research is needed to investigate pediatric thunderclap headache.

Indexed as

Headache Disorders, PrimaryAdolescentAdultChildDiagnostic ImagingHeadacheHumansSyndromeVasoconstrictionAdolescentsBenign courseChildrenPain scaleThunderclap

Identifiers

PMID35167034
OpenAlexW4212860649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.