Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35166946›Full record

ArticleScience and engineering ethics2022

University Teachers During the First Lockdown Due to SARS-CoV-2 in Italy: Stress, Issues and Perceptions of Misconduct.

Oronzo Parlangeli, Paola Palmitesta, Margherita Bracci, Enrica Marchigiani, Ileana Di Pomponio, Stefano Guidi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science and engineering ethics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Oronzo ParlangeliDepartment of Social, Political and Cognitive Sciences, University of Siena, Via Roma 56, 53100, Siena, Italy. oronzo.parlangeli@unisi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2040-3507
Paola PalmitestaDepartment of Social, Political and Cognitive Sciences, University of Siena, Via Roma 56, 53100, Siena, Italy.
Margherita BracciDepartment of Social, Political and Cognitive Sciences, University of Siena, Via Roma 56, 53100, Siena, Italy.
Enrica MarchigianiDepartment of Social, Political and Cognitive Sciences, University of Siena, Via Roma 56, 53100, Siena, Italy.
Ileana Di PomponioDepartment of Social, Political and Cognitive Sciences, University of Siena, Via Roma 56, 53100, Siena, Italy.
Stefano GuidiDepartment of Social, Political and Cognitive Sciences, University of Siena, Via Roma 56, 53100, Siena, Italy. stefano.guidi@unisi.it.
University of Siena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the spread of the pandemic and the introduction of measures aimed at its containment, it is necessary to understand in specific national contexts how home quarantine has affected the psychophysical well-being of academics, and their ability to maintain integrity. To this end we constructed an online questionnaire to investigate the levels of stress, well-being, and work-life balance in relationship with living and working conditions. Moreover, the questionnaire was designed to obtain information about the perceived occurrence, increase or decrease of misconduct in research (e.g., research misconduct by colleagues) and professional relationships (e.g., misbehaviors between colleagues, from students and toward students). The questionnaire was administered online by contacting faculty at three universities in Tuscany, Italy, asking them to relate their experience during the first lockdown (March-May 2020). Faculty members were invited to complete the questionnaire by their institutional e-mail account. The final sample consisted of 581 respondents. The results showed that inadequacies of the equipment, and particularly poor internet connection, were significantly correlated with main issues reported, such as relationships with students and research activities. Female teachers primarily suffered from stressful conditions, lacked well-being, and experienced work-life imbalance. Stress levels were related to perceptions of the frequency of misconduct and of an increase in their frequency during the period of home quarantine. Female professors, when compared to their male counterparts, perceived misconduct from students as increased and more frequent in the period of quarantine. Results point to a gender issue that is likely to arise from conditions of domestic activities imbalance and that increases stress and misconduct perception.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Communicable Disease ControlFemaleHumansMaleQuarantineUniversitiesAcademicFaculty membersGenderMisconductPandemicStressUniversity teachers

Identifiers

PMID35166946
PMCPMC8847283
OpenAlexW4212982789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.