Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35166935›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2022

Improving the accuracy of genomic predictions in an outcrossing species with hybrid cultivars between heterozygote parents: a case study of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.).

Achille Nyouma, Joseph Martin Bell, Florence Jacob, Virginie Riou, Aurore Manez, Virginie Pomiès, Hubert Domonhedo, Deni Arifiyanto, Benoit Cochard, Tristan Durand-Gasselin and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Genomic selection for morphological and yield-related traits using genome-wide SNPs in oil palm.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Achille NyoumaDepartment of Plant Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0163-6169
Joseph Martin BellDepartment of Plant Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Florence JacobPalmElit SAS, 34980, Montferrier sur Lez, France.
Virginie RiouCIRAD, UMR AGAP Institut, 34398, Montpellier, France.
Aurore ManezCIRAD, UMR AGAP Institut, 34398, Montpellier, France.
Virginie PomièsCIRAD, UMR AGAP Institut, 34398, Montpellier, France.
Hubert DomonhedoINRAB, CRA-PP, Pobè, Benin.
Deni ArifiyantoP.T. SOCFINDO Medan, Medan, Indonesia.
Benoit CochardPalmElit SAS, 34980, Montferrier sur Lez, France.
Tristan Durand-GasselinPalmElit SAS, 34980, Montferrier sur Lez, France.
David CrosCETIC (African Center of Excellence in Information and Communication Technologies), University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon. david.cros@cirad.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8601-7991
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRInstitut National des Recherches Agricoles du Bénin · BJUniversité de Yaoundé I · CM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) is a method of marker-assisted selection revolutionizing crop improvement, but it can still be optimized. For hybrid breeding between heterozygote parents of different populations or species, specific aspects can be considered to increase GS accuracy: (1) training population genotyping, i.e., only genotyping the hybrid parents or also a sample of hybrid individuals, and (2) marker effects modeling, i.e., using population-specific effects of single nucleotide polymorphism alleles model (PSAM) or across-population SNP genotype model (ASGM). Here, this was investigated empirically for the prediction of the performances of oil palm hybrids for yield traits. The GS model was trained on 352 hybrid crosses and validated on 213 independent hybrid crosses. The training and validation hybrid parents and 399 training hybrid individuals were genotyping by sequencing. Despite the small proportion of hybrid individuals genotyped and low parental heterozygosity, GS prediction accuracy increased on average by 5% (range 1.4-31.3%, depending on trait and model) when training was done using genomic data on hybrids and parents compared with only parental genomic data. With ASGM, GS prediction accuracy increased on average by 3% (- 10.2 to 40%, depending on trait and genotyping strategy) compared with PSAM. We conclude that the best GS strategy for oil palm is to aggregate genomic data of parents and hybrid individuals and to ignore the parental origin of marker alleles (ASGM). To gain a better insight into these results, future studies should examine the respective effect of capturing genetic variability within crosses and taking segregation distortion into account when genotyping hybrid individuals, and investigate the factors controlling the relative performances of ASGM and PSAM in hybrid crops.

Indexed as

ArecaceaePlant BreedingGenomicsGenotypeHeterozygoteHumansModels, GeneticPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideSelection, GeneticGBLUPGenomic selectionGenotyping by sequencingModel training

Identifiers

PMID35166935
OpenAlexW4213175836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.