ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022
[Use of acellular allogeneic nerve transplants for nerve defects of the hand : Experience from a German hand surgery center].
Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peripheral nerve injuries are often encountered in traumatological care. The aim of this manuscript is to provide initial data, experiences and performance reports from Germany in the implantation of acellular human nerve transplants in peripheral sensory nerve defects of the hand and to put these data in the context of a comprehensive review of the literature. Of the patients 4 (7 digital nerves) were examined 6 months postoperatively and 5 patients (6 digital nerves) were examined 1 year after the operation (3 were also at the 6‑month examination). All patients had a clinical improvement after nerve reconstruction (≥ S3 according to the classification of sensory recovery of the Medical Research Council modified by Mackinnon and Dellon). Disadvantages of our clinical study are the small number of patients, the inhomogeneity (primary and secondary nerve reconstruction) and the lack of comparison with other nerve reconstruction methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.