Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35166690›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2022

The Use of Wearable Pulse Oximeters in the Prompt Detection of Hypoxemia and During Movement: Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

Mauro Santos, Sarah Vollam, Marco Af Pimentel, Carlos Areia, Louise Young, Cristian Roman, Jody Ede, Philippa Piper, Elizabeth King, Mirae Harford and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The 2023 wearable photoplethysmography roadmap.Physiological measurement · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Mauro Santos *Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1470-6966
Sarah Vollam *National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2835-6271
Marco Af PimentelInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3696-8852
Carlos AreiaNational Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4668-7069
Louise YoungNational Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9094-1733
Cristian RomanInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9164-8659
Jody EdeCritical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7289-6991
Philippa PiperAdult Intensive Care Unit, Oxford University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3724-5848
Elizabeth KingAdult Intensive Care Unit, Oxford University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7360-7004
Mirae HarfordNational Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2851-1577
Akshay ShahRadcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1869-2231
Owen GustafsonAdult Intensive Care Unit, Oxford University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5450-3696
Lionel TarassenkoInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0118-1646
Peter WatkinsonNational Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1023-3927

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommercially available wearable (ambulatory) pulse oximeters have been recommended as a method for managing patients at risk of physiological deterioration, such as active patients with COVID-19 disease receiving care in hospital isolation rooms; however, their reliability in usual hospital settings is not known.

objectiveWe report the performance of wearable pulse oximeters in a simulated clinical setting when challenged by motion and low levels of arterial blood oxygen saturation (SaO

methodsThe performance of 1 wrist-worn (Wavelet) and 3 finger-worn (CheckMe O2+, AP-20, and WristOx2 3150) wearable, wireless transmission-mode pulse oximeters was evaluated. For this, 7 motion tasks were performed: at rest, sit-to-stand, tapping, rubbing, drinking, turning pages, and using a tablet. Hypoxia exposure followed, in which inspired gases were adjusted to achieve decreasing SaO

resultsSpO

conclusionsThe SpO

trial registrationISRCTN Registry 61535692; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN61535692. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034404.

Indexed as

COVID-19Wearable Electronic DevicesHumansHypoxiaOximetryReproducibility of ResultsSARS-CoV-2blood oxygencontinuous monitoringdeteriorationdiagnostic accuracyhospitalhypoxemiahypoxiamHealthpatient monitoringwearable pulse oximeterwearable technology

Identifiers

PMID35166690
PMCPMC8889481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.