Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35166677›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2022

Designing Supportive e-Interventions for Partners of Men With Prostate Cancer Using Female Partners' Experiences: Qualitative Exploration Study.

Natalie Winter, Anna Green, Hannah Jongebloed, Nicholas Ralph, Suzanne Chambers, Patricia Livingston

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natalie WinterCentre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1847-6862
Anna GreenFaculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7541-3665
Hannah JongebloedCentre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6215-1849
Nicholas RalphFaculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7404-9996
Suzanne ChambersFaculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2369-6111
Patricia LivingstonCentre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6616-3839
Deakin University · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPartners of men living with prostate cancer (PCa) can experience a variety of unmet needs that are largely unaddressed by health care professionals. There is limited evidence to suggest which approach may be most effective in supporting partners' unmet needs and further research is required to determine how to provide support to caregivers and how technology solutions can be designed.

objectiveThis study aims to explore the experience of partners of men living with PCa and their perceptions of the potential role of information technology in supporting their needs.

methodsA qualitative descriptive methodology using focus groups and phone interviews was used. Purposive sampling was used to recruit people attending a national conference supported by a national PCa organization. Interview guides were adapted from an existing evidence-based smartphone app for caregivers of people with colorectal cancer. Sessions were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. A coding framework was developed, and transcripts were coded line by line into the framework. Codes within the framework were grouped into descriptive categories that were then developed into analytical themes.

resultsA total of 17 female partners participated in the study, with an average age of 64 (SD 8.5) years. The following two main themes emerged: In the first theme, that is, How technology can be shaped to support female partners of prostate cancer survivors, the content and design of the smartphone app was discussed in addressing female partners' needs. The following four subthemes were developed: getting support from social networks and resources, the lack of relevant information, demystifying future care expectations during and following a PCa diagnosis, and delivering the smartphone app-to whom and from whom. In the second theme, that is, The benefits and barriers of technology, the suitability of smartphone apps as a supportive modality for female partners was described. This included three subthemes: the smartphone app as an appropriate modality for supporting female partners, the future anticipated benefits of using the smartphone app, and concerns for storing and accessing information on the internet.

conclusionsA smartphone app may be a suitable modality for providing information and peer support to female partners of men living with PCa. There is a need to provide peer support for female partners in future interventions to ensure that female partners' intimacy and daily practical needs are met.

Indexed as

caregiverse-interventionmHealthmobile phoneprostate cancerprostatic neoplasmsqualitative researchsmartphone

Identifiers

PMID35166677
PMCPMC8889485
OpenAlexW4213362061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.