Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35166453›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2022

Development of a real-time PCR assay for detection and differentiation of Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae and a novel respiratory-associated Mycoplasma species in domestic sheep and goats.

Lance W Noll, Margaret A Highland, Vaughn A Hamill, Wai Ning Tiffany Tsui, Elizabeth P Porter, Nanyan Lu, Tesfaalem Sebhatu, Susan Brown, David R Herndon, Paige C Grossman and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparative genomics ofMicrobial genomics · 2023
    Article
  5. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lance W NollKansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8241-0705
Margaret A HighlandKansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.
Vaughn A HamillKansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0245-7069
Wai Ning Tiffany TsuiKansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.
Elizabeth P PorterKansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1041-3282
Nanyan LuKansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.
Tesfaalem SebhatuKansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.
Susan BrownBioinformatics Center, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.
David R HerndonUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Animal Disease Research Unit, Pullman, Washington, USA.
Paige C GrossmanDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA.
Jianfa BaiKansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0021-3036
Kansas State University · USAgricultural Research Service · USWashington State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A novel respiratory-associated Mycoplasma species (M. sp. nov.) of unknown clinical significance was recently identified that causes false positive results with multiple published PCR methods reported to specifically detect Mycoplasma ovipneumonaie, a well-known respiratory pathogen in small ruminants. This necessitates our objective to develop a real-time PCR (qPCR) assay for improved specificity and sensitivity, and more rapid detection and differentiation of M. ovipneumoniae and the M. sp. nov. in domestic sheep (DS) and domestic goat (DG) samples, as compared to a conventional PCR and sequencing (cPCR-seq) assay. Primers and probes were designed based on available M. ovipneumoniae 16S rRNA gene sequences in the GenBank database, and partial 16S rRNA gene sequences provided by the United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) for M. ovipneumoniae and M. sp. nov. USDA-ARS provided DS (n = 153) and DG (n = 194) nasal swab nucleic acid that previously tested positive for either M. ovipneumoniae (n = 117) or M. sp. nov. (n = 138), or negative for both targets (n = 92) by cPCR-seq. A host 18S rRNA gene was included as an internal control to monitor for the failure of nucleic acid extraction and possible PCR inhibition. For samples positive by cPCR-seq, qPCR agreement was 88.0% (103/117; κ = 0.81) and 89.9% (124/138; κ = 0.84) for M. ovipneumoniae and M. sp. nov., respectively; 12 of 255 (4.7%) cPCR-seq positive samples were qPCR positive for both targets. Of samples negative by cPCR for both mycoplasmas, qPCR detected M. ovipneumoniae and M. sp. nov. in 6.5% (6/92) and 4.3% (4/92), respectively. Samples with discordant results between the cPCR and sequencing assay and the new qPCR were analyzed by target sequencing; successfully sequenced samples had identity matches that confirmed the qPCR result. The increased target specificity of this qPCR is predicted to increase testing accuracy as compared to other published assays.

Indexed as

Goat DiseasesMycoplasmaMycoplasma ovipneumoniaeSheep DiseasesAnimalsGoatsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSheepSheep, DomesticRNA, Ribosomal, 16SgoatsmycoplasmaMycoplasma ovipneumoniaepolymerase chain reactionreal-time PCRrespiratory systemsheep

Identifiers

PMID35166453
PMCPMC9790229
OpenAlexW4213320082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.