Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35166150›Full record

Trial reportCephalalgia : an international journal of headache2022

FollowTheSutures: Piloting a new way to administer onabotulinumtoxinA for chronic migraine.

Lars Jacob Stovner, Knut Hagen, Erling Tronvik, Gøril Bruvik Gravdahl, Rami Burstein, David W Dodick

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03543254 ("Follow the Sutures". An Open Multicenter, Multinational Pilot Study to Explore Tolerability, Safety and Effect of a New Procedure for Injecting Botulinum Toxin in the Head Against Chronic Migraine), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03543254 phase2completednot on this map

"Follow the Sutures". An Open Multicenter, Multinational Pilot Study to Explore Tolerability, Safety and Effect of a New Procedure for Injecting Botulinum Toxin in the Head Against Chronic Migraine

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyRan2018 to 2021Enrolled20ConditionsMigraine Disorders, Chronic DiseaseArmsBoNT-A
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Dural Immune Cells, CGRP, and Migraine.Frontiers in neurology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lars Jacob StovnerDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Knut HagenDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Erling TronvikDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Gøril Bruvik GravdahlDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Rami BursteinDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale Arizona.
David W DodickDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NOSt Olav's University Hospital · NOBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnatomical and experimental data indicate that onabotulinimtoxin A could be more efficient and cost-effective for treating chronic migraine with injections targeting the cranial sutures, where collaterals from the meninges penetrate the skull.

methodsA new injection paradigm (FollowTheSutures) was tested for safety, tolerability and feasibility in a Phase II, open-label, non-controlled, single-center pilot study. Ninety units of onabotulinimtoxin A (Botox®), were injected in 18 sites over the area of the cranial sutures. Adverse events and potential beneficial effects were recorded in a headache diary at least 4 weeks before, and for 12 weeks after the injections. A higher dilution than normal of onabotulinimtoxin A was used to get better diffusion.

resultsNineteen (of 20 included) women with chronic migraine received the injections and were evaluable. There was only one treatment-related adverse event (reduced power of chewing for some weeks). Otherwise, the procedure was overall well tolerated. Patients improved on most efficacy parameters after the injections. There was little or no effect on glabellar or forehead lines.

conclusionsThe protocol was safe and well tolerated. Lower risk of unblinding due to the absence of cosmetic effects should make the injection procedure well suited for a large, randomized, placebo-controlled study. If efficacy is confirmed, it will be markedly less costly than the standard procedure.Trial registration: EUDRACT (2017-002516-13), ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03543254).

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type AMigraine DisordersDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHeadacheHumansPilot ProjectsTreatment OutcomeBotulinum Toxins, Type ACranial suturesinjectionspilot study

Identifiers

PMID35166150
PMCPMC9109235
OpenAlexW4213257133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.