Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35166110›Full record

ArticleNano letters2022

Nanoparticle Surface Engineering with Heparosan Polysaccharide Reduces Serum Protein Adsorption and Enhances Cellular Uptake.

Wen Yang, Lin Wang, Mulin Fang, Vinit Sheth, Yushan Zhang, Alyssa M Holden, Nathan D Donahue, Dixy E Green, Alex N Frickenstein, Evan M Mettenbrink and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nano letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wen YangStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States.
Lin WangStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4636-8225
Mulin FangDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States.
Vinit ShethStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States.
Yushan ZhangDepartment of Pathology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, United States.
Alyssa M HoldenStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States.
Nathan D DonahueStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States.
Dixy E GreenDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, United States.
Alex N FrickensteinStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States.
Evan M MettenbrinkStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States.
Tyler A SchwemleyStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States.
Emmy R FrancekStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States.
Majood HaddadStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States.
Md Nazir HossenDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, California Northstate University, Elk Grove, California 95757, United States.
Shirsha MukherjeeStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States.
Si WuDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6346-7359
Paul L DeAngelisDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, United States.
Stefan WilhelmStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2167-6221
University of Oklahoma · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · USCalifornia Northstate University · US

Funding

Tissue Pathology Shared ResourceP30CA225520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI Michael S. Businelle · 2018 to 2026
$27.1M
Use of 3D Quantitative Optical Methods to Optimize Mebendazole Treatment of Ovarian CancerP20GM135009 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI Javier Antonio Jo · 2022 to 2026
$13.6M
Yale Cooperative Hematology Specialized Core CenterU54DK106857 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHN HWA, Diane S Krause · 2015 to 2026
$9.7M
Quantitative Analysis of Serum Autoantibody Repertories in Systemic Lupus ErythematosusR01AI141625 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI SINGH, SHANTERI, SMITH, KENNETH MICHAEL · 2019 to 2023
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA225520NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI141625NIDDK NIH HHS U54 DK106857NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM135009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanoparticle modification with poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) is a widely used surface engineering strategy in nanomedicine. However, since the artificial PEG polymer may adversely impact nanomedicine safety and efficacy, alternative surface modifications are needed. Here, we explored the "self" polysaccharide heparosan (HEP) to prepare colloidally stable HEP-coated nanoparticles, including gold and silver nanoparticles and liposomes. We found that the HEP-coating reduced the nanoparticle protein corona formation as efficiently as PEG coatings upon serum incubation. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry revealed the protein corona profiles. Heparosan-coated nanoparticles exhibited up to 230-fold higher uptake in certain innate immune cells, but not in other tested cell types, than PEGylated nanoparticles. No noticeable cytotoxicity was observed. Serum proteins did not mediate the high cell uptake of HEP-coated nanoparticles. Our work suggests that HEP polymers may be an effective surface modification technology for nanomedicines to safely and efficiently target certain innate immune cells.

Indexed as

Metal NanoparticlesNanoparticlesProtein CoronaAdsorptionBlood ProteinsDisaccharidesPolyethylene GlycolsPolymersPolysaccharidesSilverBlood ProteinsDisaccharidesheparosanPolyethylene GlycolsPolymersPolysaccharidesProtein CoronaSilvercellular uptakedrug deliveryheparosanliposomenanomedicineNanoparticlesPEGylationprotein coronasurface engineering

Identifiers

PMID35166110
PMCPMC9540343
OpenAlexW4213087234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.