Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35166046›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2022

Genetic testing users in Italy and Germany: Health orientation, health-related habits, and psychological profile.

Giulia Ongaro, Eleonora Brivio, Clizia Cincidda, Serena Oliveri, Francesca Spinella, Daniela Steinberger, Ilaria Cutica, Alessandra Gorini, Gabriella Pravettoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Giulia OngaroApplied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1287-4015
Eleonora BrivioApplied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7305-6457
Clizia CinciddaApplied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1967-9565
Serena OliveriApplied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7185-4260
Francesca SpinellaEurofins Genoma Group, Molecular Genetics Laboratories, Rome, Italy.
Daniela SteinbergerInstitute for Humangenetics, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Ilaria CuticaDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2749-0719
Alessandra GoriniDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3216-1784
Gabriella PravettoniApplied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4843-4663

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRapid advances in genomic knowledge and widespread access to the web contributed to the development of genetic services by private companies or medical laboratories. In the European landscape, though, there is not a single coherent regulatory approach to genetic testing (GT). The study aimed to investigate differences and similarities between two populations of GT users, Italians and Germans, in terms of health-related behaviors, psychological characteristics, and attitudes toward genetic information.

methodsNinety-nine Italian GT users from one private genetic company and 64 Germans GT users from one medical laboratory, completed an ad hoc self-administered questionnaire.

resultsResults showed significant differences in health-related behaviors (unhealthy eating behaviors, smoking behaviors, and frequency in medical check-ups), with Germans reporting higher levels of unhealthy eating habits and smoking behaviors than Italians; Italian users also were more medically controlled. Furthermore, German participants were less willing to change their lifestyle following the GT results compared to Italian participants. Regarding psychological variables, German users felt more confident about their physical well-being and they seemed more motivated than Italians to avoid becoming unhealthy. Finally, two samples differed in the way they accessed genetic testing (with the Italians guided predominately by a physician in contrast with the Germans who were recommended by friends) and managed genetic testing results (with Italian participants significantly more willing to share results with doctors than German participants, who preferred sharing with the family).

conclusionThe analysis of cultural and organizational differences could help in defining adequate guidelines for counseling, and provide inputs for regulators in different European contexts.

Indexed as

AttitudeGenetic TestingGermanyHabitsHumansItalygenetic testinggenetic testing usershealth-related habitspsychological profile

Identifiers

PMID35166046
PMCPMC8922951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.