Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35165969›Full record

ReviewAddiction (Abingdon, England)2022

The representation of females in clinical trials for substance use disorder conducted in the United States (2010-19).

Christine M Gunn, Magda Pankowska, Miriam Harris, Emma Helsing, Tracy A Battaglia, Sarah M Bagley

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Is It Time to Update Clinical Care Guidelines to Address Sex and Gender Differences in Smoking Cessation Medication Efficacy?Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Sex, Gender, and Alcohol Use: Implications for Women and Low-Risk Drinking Guidelines.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christine M GunnDepartment of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Women's Health Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3340-2834
Magda PankowskaDepartment of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Women's Health Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Miriam HarrisDepartment of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Emma HelsingDepartment of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Women's Health Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Tracy A BattagliaDepartment of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Women's Health Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Sarah M BagleyDepartment of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of General Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7524-0178
Boston University · US

Funding

MassHEAL - Reducing overdose deaths by 40% (2019-2023)UM1DA049412 · NIDA · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI SAMET, JEFFREY H. · 2019 to 2023
$82.9M
Mentoring the next generation of addiction clinician scientists while responding to the opioid epidemicR25DA037756 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI FAIRBAIRN, NADIA · 2014 to 2023
$3.6M
A Behavioral Intervention to Engage Emerging Adults in Addiction Treatment after a Non-fatal Opioid OverdoseK23DA044324 · NIDA · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAGLEY, SARAH M · 2017 to 2021
$938k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA044324NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA037756NIDA NIH HHS UM1 DA049412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsWomen have historically been under-represented in clinical research, but the extent to which this is true for substance use disorder (SUD) trials is unknown. We aimed to determine the ratio of female:male participation in clinical trials for SUDs and describe the reporting of sex-specific outcomes from 2010 to 2019.

designA retrospective cohort review of clinical trials involving people with SUD.

settingUnited States.

participantsClinical trials including people with SUD registered in clinicaltrials.gov and completed between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2019 were reviewed. Trials were excluded if they had < 30 participants, focused on SUD prevention, were conducted outside the United States and/or did not report data on participant sex or gender. MEASUREMENTS: The following were extracted for each trial: primary outcome, number of participants enrolled, analytical sample size, percentage of participants who were female, inclusion of transgender participants, whether sex-based analyses were performed, funding source, type of SUD and type of intervention. Relative representation in trials was examined using the female:male ratio, reported using median ratios and by year of trial completion. The proportion of females participating was adjusted using the underlying disease prevalence among females using National Survey on Drug Use and Health data.

findingsA total of 316 trials met inclusion criteria: 274 were mixed-sex, 12 enrolled only males and 30 only females. In 274 mixed-sex trials, 40% of 57 544 participants were female. Only 22 trials (8%) reported any sex-specific analyses; four studies (1.5%) reported inclusion of transgender participants. Females represented 35% of participants in trials targeting illicit drug use disorder, 52% in nicotine use disorder and 29% in alcohol use disorder. Accounting for underlying disease prevalence revealed that women had the lowest relative enrollment in alcohol use disorder trials (median participation to prevalence ratio in 2017: 0.58; 95% confidence interval: 0.13, 0.91).

conclusionsA review of 316 US clinical trials for alcohol, nicotine and illicit substance use disorders completed between 2010 and 2019 showed that females were enrolled at lower rates than males overall. Only 8% of the trials reviewed reported sex-specific analyses and 1.5% reported transgender participants.

Indexed as

AlcoholismSubstance-Related DisordersTobacco Use DisorderFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesAlcohol use disorderClinical trialsgender biasNicotine use disordersex biassubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID35165969
PMCPMC10062729
OpenAlexW4212958825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.