Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35165855›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2022

Imaging of Prenatal and Neonatal Intra-abdominal Genitourinary Tumors: a Review of the Literature.

Megan Guerre, Colin Boehnlein, Roya Sohaey, Casey A Seideman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Megan GuerreSchool of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Colin BoehnleinSchool of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Roya SohaeyDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Casey A SeidemanDepartment of Urology, OHSU Doernbecher Children's Hospital, Oregon Health & Science University, 700 S.W. Campus Drive, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. Seideman@ohsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5426-2282
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewOur goal was to summarize current literature related to imaging of intra-abdominal genitourinary tumors diagnosed in the prenatal or neonatal period. Our specific interests included modalities used, diagnoses made, changing incidence of tumor detection, and proposed future uses of these imaging modalities. RECENT

findingsFetal and neonatal MRI have been used as an adjunct to ultrasound for better characterization and assessment of congenital mesoblastic nephroma, juvenile granulosa cell tumor, and other tumors. Despite recent literature describing fetal and neonatal MRI, it is not yet possible to determine whether its use is changing the incidence of tumor detection. Improvements in imaging technology, specifically the use of fetal MRI, have allowed for earlier identification of genitourinary masses with improved capability for diagnosis, surveillance, surgical planning, and sometimes prenatal treatment of the malignancy and related diagnoses, with a goal of preventing pregnancy and delivery complications.

Indexed as

Kidney NeoplasmsNephroma, MesoblasticFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMagnetic Resonance ImagingPregnancyUltrasonography, PrenatalUrogenital SystemFetal MRIGenitourinaryGenitourinary tumorsImagingNeoplasmUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID35165855
OpenAlexW4213093701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.