ArticleProtein & cell2022
A framework for the responsible reform of the 14-day rule in human embryo research.
Article in Protein & cell, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- What counts as an embryo? : The regulatory status of stem cell-based embryo models in Asia.EMBO reports · 2026Article
- Synthetic embryos: current progress, application and challenges.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2026Review
- Review
- Legal protections forFrontiers in reproductive health · 2025Review
- Survey of Japanese researchers and the public regarding the culture of human embryos in vitro beyond 14 days.Stem cell reports · 2023Article
- Manufacturing with pluripotent stem cells (PSConf 2021): Key issues for future research and development.Cell proliferation · 2022Article
- Responsible governance of human germline genome editing in China†.Biology of reproduction · 2022Article
- Are we ready for the revision of the 14-day rule? Implications from Chinese legislations guiding human embryo and embryoid research.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.