Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35165819›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2022

Comparing ventilation modes by electrical impedance segmentography in ventilated children.

Jennifer Bettina Brandt, Alex Mahlknecht, Tobias Werther, Roman Ullrich, Michael Hermon

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer Bettina BrandtDivision of Neonatology, Medical University of Vienna, Pediatric Intensive Care & Neuropediatrics, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5517-9381
Alex MahlknechtHospital of the Brothers of St. John of God, Eisenstadt, Austria.
Tobias WertherDivision of Neonatology, Medical University of Vienna, Pediatric Intensive Care & Neuropediatrics, Vienna, Austria.
Roman UllrichDepartment for Anesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Michael HermonDivision of Neonatology, Medical University of Vienna, Pediatric Intensive Care & Neuropediatrics, Vienna, Austria. michael.hermon@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0002-9357-2491
Medical University of Vienna · ATHospital of the Brothers of St. John of God · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrical impedance segmentography offers a new radiation-free possibility of continuous bedside ventilation monitoring. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and reproducibility of this bedside tool by comparing synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) with neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) in critically-ill children. In this prospective randomized case-control crossover trial in a pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary center, including eight mechanically-ventilated children, four sequences of two different ventilation modes were consecutively applied. All children were randomized into two groups; starting on NAVA or SIMV. During ventilation, electric impedance segmentography measurements were recorded. The relative difference of vertical impedance between both ventilatory modes was measured (median 0.52, IQR 0-0.87). These differences in left apical lung segments were present during the first (median 0.58, IQR 0-0.89, p = 0.04) and second crossover (median 0.50, IQR 0-0.88, p = 0.05) as well as across total impedance (0.52 IQR 0-0.87; p = 0.002). During NAVA children showed a shift of impedance towards caudal lung segments, compared to SIMV. Electrical impedance segmentography enables dynamic monitoring of transthoracic impedance. The immediate benefit of personalized ventilatory strategies can be seen when using this simple-to-apply bedside tool for measuring lung impedance.

Indexed as

Interactive Ventilatory SupportChildElectric ImpedanceHumansProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsRespiration, ArtificialBedside monitoringDependent lung areaElectrical Impedance SegmentographyNAVAPediatric ventilationPersonalized ventilation

Identifiers

PMID35165819
PMCPMC8853312
OpenAlexW4213060382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.