Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35165810›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2022

Selection of optimal aggregation function for the revised leachate pollution index (r-LPI).

Tribhuwan Singh Bisht, Dinesh Kumar, Babu J Alappat

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tribhuwan Singh BishtDepartment of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India. tribhuwanbisht12@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1671-9848
Dinesh KumarNorth Delhi Municipal Corporation, New Delhi, 110002, India.
Babu J AlappatDepartment of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A tool to quantify the pollution potential of leachate, termed the revised leachate pollution index (r-LPI), has been developed. It was developed using the fuzzy Delphi analytic hierarchy process (FDAHP). The formulation entails four major steps: parameter selection, weight calculation, normalization of parameters, and aggregation of the parameters. Eleven leachate parameters categorized into three criteria were selected using the fuzzy Delphi method (FDM). The relative weights of the parameters and the criteria were computed using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP), and rating curves were used for normalization of the parameters. The selection of an aggregation function is one of the most critical steps in the development of a composite indicator. In this study, the concept of r-LPI was briefly discussed and 14 different aggregation functions were examined to estimate the pollution potential of landfill leachate. Based on accountability and non-accountability of weights of the parameters, ambiguity, eclipsing, and constant functional behavior, 8 aggregation functions were eliminated. The remaining six aggregation functions were subjected to sensitivity analysis. Furthermore, information lost due to aggregation of parameters was quantified. Based on the findings, it was concluded that the weighted additive function effectively quantifies the pollution potential of landfill leachate and thus recommended for the r-LPI.

Indexed as

Refuse DisposalWater Pollutants, ChemicalEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutionSolid WasteWaste Disposal FacilitiesSolid WasteWater Pollutants, ChemicalAggregation functionEnvironmental indicatorLandfill leachateMunicipal solid wasteSensitivity analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.