Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35165770›Full record

ArticleRheumatology international2022

The impact of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic on the management of rheumatic disease: a national clinician-based survey.

Abdulvahap Kahveci, Alper Gümüştepe, Nurhan Güven, Şebnem Ataman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abdulvahap KahveciDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ibni Sina Hospital, 4th Floor, Altındağ, Ankara, Turkey. abdulvahap_kahveci@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2611-2372
Alper GümüştepeDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ibni Sina Hospital, 4th Floor, Altındağ, Ankara, Turkey.
Nurhan GüvenDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ibni Sina Hospital, 4th Floor, Altındağ, Ankara, Turkey.
Şebnem AtamanDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ibni Sina Hospital, 4th Floor, Altındağ, Ankara, Turkey.
Ankara University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the management of rheumatic diseases (RD). An online survey included 10 questions were designed to assess potential differences in rheumatology practice. The survey was conducted between March 2021 and June 2021. Marginal homogeneity test was used to compare frequencies of outpatient clinic patients between the pre-pandemic and pandemic. Other results were analyzed by descriptive statistics. One hundred three clinicians (75.7% in rheumatology practice for at least five years) responded to the survey. Almost 70% examined < 30 patients per day during the pandemic while nearly 70% examined ≥ 30 patients per day before the pandemic (p < 0.001). They indicated following reasons for decreasing outpatient clinic activity were concerns regarding COVID-19 transmission risk of the patients (95%) and the clinicians (53%), being able to supply chronic medications directly from the pharmacy (85%), lockdown (71%), limited outpatient appointments (64%) and using telemedicine (20%). The frequencies of rheumatology daily routine procedures were decreased as follows; patient hospitalization for diagnosing (80%) and treatment (78%), labial salivary gland biopsy (63%), Schirmer's test/salivary flow rate test (56%), nail bed video-capillaroscopy (52%), musculoskeletal ultrasonography (51%) and Pathergy test (50%). Clinicians hesitated to use rituximab (63%) mostly, followed by cyclophosphamide (53%), glucocorticoids (43%), tofacitinib (41%), mycophenolate mofetil (36%), and azathioprine (33%). In this first national survey, the prominent differences in the management of RD have decreased outpatient clinic activity, reduced rheumatology daily procedures, and hesitancy to use some rheumatic drugs.

Indexed as

COVID-19Rheumatic DiseasesTelemedicineCommunicable Disease ControlHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19PandemicRheumatic diseaseRheumatology practiceSurvey

Identifiers

PMID35165770
PMCPMC8853340
OpenAlexW4213031815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.