ArticleReproductive biomedicine & society online2022
Fertility treatment delays during COVID-19: Profiles, feelings and concerns of impacted patients.
Article in Reproductive biomedicine & society online, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sociodemographic and medical correlates of fertility-related quality of life in primary infertile Czech couples attending fertility clinics.Health psychology report · 2026Article
- Impact of COVID-19 on live birth and perinatal outcomes following subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfer.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- The psychosocial impact of exercise as an intervention for persons living with obesity and female infertility: A rapid scoping review and pilot study.PLOS mental health · 2025Article
- Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Women's Health and Obstetric Outcomes after Assisted Reproduction: A Survey from an Italian Fertility Center.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- SARS-CoV-2, fertility and assisted reproduction.Human reproduction update · 2023Review
- COVID-19-related uncertainty: fertility staff experiences of its sources, processing, responses, and consequences.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- The Perspective of Patients and Health Professionals on the Prioritization of Assisted Reproductive Techniques. The PRIOFER Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2023Article
- Assessment of patients' perceptions towards embryo disposition after donation of embryos to a research biobank.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023Article
- An online survey of UK women's attitudes to having children, the age they want children and the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in unprecedented measures across all health services around the globe, including the large-scale cessation of assisted reproductive technology treatment in Europe as clinics closed, causing disruption and delay to the fertility treatment of thousands of patients in the UK alone. This research explores how patients were impacted by the delay and disruption, and their feelings, concerns and reactions. A mixed-methods, anonymous, online questionnaire, live between 19 May and 30 June 2020, was used to target all fertility patients aged >18 years whose treatment had been impacted by COVID-19. In total, 709 people began the questionnaire and 501 completed it in the time available (70.7% completion rate). Patients reported feeling 'powerless/helpless' (78.3%), 'frustrated' (59.3%) and 'anxious' (54.7%) in response to the closure of fertility clinics. The majority were 'very concerned' about time passing and not knowing when they could start treatment again (79.0%), and the length of waiting lists when clinics reopened (70.9%). While 76.8% of respondents had some concerns around contracting COVID-19, 42.9% were 'not at all concerned' about undergoing in-vitro fertilization treatment during a pandemic. Variables such as funding source, duration of infertility, previous experience of fertility treatment, treatment stage and the presence of children were correlated with significant intragroup differences in the types of concerns reported. The large majority (72.7%) of respondents stated their eagerness to start treatment as soon as possible, and 9.4% said that they had already resumed treatment; only 6.0% of respondents wanted to wait due to concerns related to COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.