Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35165660›Full record

ArticleReproductive biomedicine & society online2022

Fertility treatment delays during COVID-19: Profiles, feelings and concerns of impacted patients.

Zeynep B Gürtin, Ephia Jasmin, Philomena Da Silva, Carmel Dennehy, Joyce Harper, Shirin Kanjani

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive biomedicine & society online, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. SARS-CoV-2, fertility and assisted reproduction.Human reproduction update · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zeynep B GürtinEGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
Ephia JasminUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Trust, Reproductive Medicine Unit, London, UK.
Philomena Da SilvaUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Trust, Reproductive Medicine Unit, London, UK.
Carmel DennehyUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Trust, Reproductive Medicine Unit, London, UK.
Joyce HarperEGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
Shirin KanjaniUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Trust, Reproductive Medicine Unit, London, UK.
University College London · GBMRC Centre for Reproductive Health · GBThe Centre for Reproductive & Genetic Health

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in unprecedented measures across all health services around the globe, including the large-scale cessation of assisted reproductive technology treatment in Europe as clinics closed, causing disruption and delay to the fertility treatment of thousands of patients in the UK alone. This research explores how patients were impacted by the delay and disruption, and their feelings, concerns and reactions. A mixed-methods, anonymous, online questionnaire, live between 19 May and 30 June 2020, was used to target all fertility patients aged >18 years whose treatment had been impacted by COVID-19. In total, 709 people began the questionnaire and 501 completed it in the time available (70.7% completion rate). Patients reported feeling 'powerless/helpless' (78.3%), 'frustrated' (59.3%) and 'anxious' (54.7%) in response to the closure of fertility clinics. The majority were 'very concerned' about time passing and not knowing when they could start treatment again (79.0%), and the length of waiting lists when clinics reopened (70.9%). While 76.8% of respondents had some concerns around contracting COVID-19, 42.9% were 'not at all concerned' about undergoing in-vitro fertilization treatment during a pandemic. Variables such as funding source, duration of infertility, previous experience of fertility treatment, treatment stage and the presence of children were correlated with significant intragroup differences in the types of concerns reported. The large majority (72.7%) of respondents stated their eagerness to start treatment as soon as possible, and 9.4% said that they had already resumed treatment; only 6.0% of respondents wanted to wait due to concerns related to COVID-19.

Indexed as

Assisted reproductionCoronavirus diseaseCounsellingCOVID-19FertilityPandemicPsychologySARS-COV-2Sociology

Identifiers

PMID35165660
PMCPMC8818556
OpenAlexW4210933998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.