ArticleCureus2022
Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Score: Is It Useful for Evaluation of Fibrosis Severity in Chronic Hepatitis C Infection?
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating periportal fibrosis in schistosomiasis mansoni using the ELF [Enhanced Liver Fibrosis] score: A pilot study.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- The possible pathogenesis of liver fibrosis: therapeutic potential of natural polyphenols.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe assessment of liver fibrosis is important in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). In recent years, non-invasive tests like enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) have been developed as an alternative to liver biopsy for estimating the severity of liver fibrosis. Therefore, we aimed to assess whether the ELF score can be used for fibrosis severity estimation using liver biopsy as the gold standard. MATERIALS AND
methodsForty-nine patients with CHC were enrolled in this study. Liver biopsy, ELF assessment, and transient elastography (TE) were performed in all patients, and severity of fibrosis on histopathology was assessed by meta-analysis of histological data in viral hepatitis (METAVIR) score. In addition, the diagnostic performance of ELF was evaluated by receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) analyses, and liver biopsy histopathology was taken as the gold standard for the severity of liver fibrosis.
resultsThe area under receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) for significant fibrosis of ELF score was 0.64 (95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.48-0.79) and of TE was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.73-0.96). The AUROC for advance fibrosis of ELF was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.57-0.97) and TE was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.94-1.0). The calculated cut-offs of ELF overestimated fibrosis in 53.06% (26/49) of patients and underestimated fibrosis in 6.12% (3/49) patients. AUROC of TE was significantly better than ELF for diagnosis of significant fibrosis (p=0.004) and advanced fibrosis (p=0.034).
conclusionThe ELF score can be used for estimating the severity of fibrosis but it is inferior to TE in estimating liver fibrosis severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.