Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35165453›Full record

ArticleNature medicine2022

Antibody responses and correlates of protection in the general population after two doses of the ChAdOx1 or BNT162b2 vaccines.

Jia Wei, Koen B Pouwels, Nicole Stoesser, Philippa C Matthews, Ian Diamond, Ruth Studley, Emma Rourke, Duncan Cook, John I Bell, John N Newton and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 150 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
150citing papers in PubMed
26.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

150 citing papers in PubMed, 266 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Immunogenicity of Omicron BA.1-adapted BNT162b2 vaccines: randomized trial, 3-month follow-up.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Associations of Pre-Pandemic CKD With Acute and Post-Acute COVID-19: The C4R Study.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

90 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

Jia Wei *Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Koen B Pouwels *The National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance at the University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7097-8950
Nicole StoesserNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4508-7969
Philippa C MatthewsNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ian DiamondOffice for National Statistics, Newport, UK.
Ruth StudleyOffice for National Statistics, Newport, UK.
Emma RourkeOffice for National Statistics, Newport, UK.
Duncan CookOffice for National Statistics, Newport, UK.
John I BellOffice of the Regius Professor of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
John N NewtonHealth Improvement Directorate, Public Health England, London, UK.
Jeremy FarrarWellcome Trust, London, UK.
Alison HowarthNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Brian D MarsdenNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sarah HoosdallyNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
E Yvonne JonesNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
David I StuartNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Derrick W CrookNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Tim E A PetoNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
A Sarah WalkerNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
David W EyreBig Data Institute, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. david.eyre@bdi.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5095-6367
COVID-19 Infection Survey team
University of Oxford · GBOffice for National Statistics · GBIQVIA (United Kingdom) · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBOpen Data Institute · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBPublic Health England · GBPublic Health Scotland · GBScottish Government · GBWelsh Government · GBDepartment of Health and Social Care · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GBNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBWellcome Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR200915Medical Research Council MC_UU_00008/6Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/22Medical Research Council MR/V001329/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 110110/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibody responses are an important part of immunity after Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. However, antibody trajectories and the associated duration of protection after a second vaccine dose remain unclear. In this study, we investigated anti-spike IgG antibody responses and correlates of protection after second doses of ChAdOx1 or BNT162b2 vaccines for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the United Kingdom general population. In 222,493 individuals, we found significant boosting of anti-spike IgG by the second doses of both vaccines in all ages and using different dosing intervals, including the 3-week interval for BNT162b2. After second vaccination, BNT162b2 generated higher peak levels than ChAdOX1. Older individuals and males had lower peak levels with BNT162b2 but not ChAdOx1, whereas declines were similar across ages and sexes with ChAdOX1 or BNT162b2. Prior infection significantly increased antibody peak level and half-life with both vaccines. Anti-spike IgG levels were associated with protection from infection after vaccination and, to an even greater degree, after prior infection. At least 67% protection against infection was estimated to last for 2-3 months after two ChAdOx1 doses, for 5-8 months after two BNT162b2 doses in those without prior infection and for 1-2 years for those unvaccinated after natural infection. A third booster dose might be needed, prioritized to ChAdOx1 recipients and those more clinically vulnerable.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Antibody FormationBNT162 VaccineChAdOx1 nCoV-19HumansImmunoglobulin GMaleBNT162 VaccineChAdOx1 nCoV-19Immunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID35165453
PMCPMC9117148
OpenAlexW4212781360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.