ArticleScientific reports2022
Experimental investigations into the performance of die-sinking mixed-gas atomization discharge ablation process on titanium alloy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machining characteristics and process parameter optimization of Near-dry electrical discharge milling of titanium alloy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
As a variant of highly efficient electrical discharge machining (EDM), the die-sinking mixed-gas atomization discharge ablation process (DMA-DAP) uses an atomized dielectric formed by a mixed gas, which mainly composed of oxygen and supplemented by nitrogen, and water medium as the discharge medium. In this technology, the oxygen in the medium is used for exothermic oxidation, and the vaporization and explosion of the water generates a chip removal force for highly efficient erosion. The present work uses single-factor tests to compare the characteristics of processing the difficult-to-machine material titanium-alloy special-shaped cavities using either DMA-DAP or EDM. The current, pulse width, pulse interval, and dielectric pressure are selected as the single-factor processing parameters, and how they influence the material removal rate (MRR), electrode relative wear rate (ERWR) and the surface morphology of the processed square cavities is analyzed. The results show that with DMA-DAP, the MRR is more than 12 times that of EDM, the ERWR is reduced by more than 98%, and the surface morphology is relatively good. Finally, taking an aero-engine radial diffuser as the profiling object, DMA-DAP realizes a profiling sample in the form of a variable-cross-section cavity that EDM cannot process, and the efficient die-sinking processing ability of DMA-DAP is verified.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.