Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35165311›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Stain-free detection of embryo polarization using deep learning.

Cheng Shen, Adiyant Lamba, Meng Zhu, Ray Zhang, Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz, Changhuei Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Cheng Shen *Department of Electrical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Adiyant Lamba *Mammalian Embryo and Stem Cell Group, Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EG, UK.
Meng ZhuMammalian Embryo and Stem Cell Group, Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EG, UK.
Ray ZhangDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Magdalena Zernicka-GoetzMammalian Embryo and Stem Cell Group, Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EG, UK. magdaz@caltech.edu.
Changhuei YangDepartment of Electrical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA. chyang@caltech.edu.
California Institute of Technology · USUniversity of Cambridge · GBHarvard University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Temporal program for cell fate specification in the mouse embryoR01HD100456 · NICHD · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz · 2020 to 2026
$3.3M
Biological mechanisms that eliminate aneuploid cells from a mosaic conceptus in the mouse model systemR01HD101489 · NICHD · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ZERNICKA-GOETZ, MAGDALENA · 2021 to 2025
$2.6M
Medical Research CouncilNICHD NIH HHS R01 HD100456NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD101489Wellcome Trust 098287/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polarization of the mammalian embryo at the right developmental time is critical for its development to term and would be valuable in assessing the potential of human embryos. However, tracking polarization requires invasive fluorescence staining, impermissible in the in vitro fertilization clinic. Here, we report the use of artificial intelligence to detect polarization from unstained time-lapse movies of mouse embryos. We assembled a dataset of bright-field movie frames from 8-cell-stage embryos, side-by-side with corresponding images of fluorescent markers of cell polarization. We then used an ensemble learning model to detect whether any bright-field frame showed an embryo before or after onset of polarization. Our resulting model has an accuracy of 85% for detecting polarization, significantly outperforming human volunteers trained on the same data (61% accuracy). We discovered that our self-learning model focuses upon the angle between cells as one known cue for compaction, which precedes polarization, but it outperforms the use of this cue alone. By compressing three-dimensional time-lapsed image data into two-dimensions, we are able to reduce data to an easily manageable size for deep learning processing. In conclusion, we describe a method for detecting a key developmental feature of embryo development that avoids clinically impermissible fluorescence staining.

Indexed as

Cell PolarityDeep LearningAnimalsColoring AgentsEmbryo, MammalianEmbryonic DevelopmentFertilization in VitroHumansMiceStaining and LabelingColoring Agents

Identifiers

PMID35165311
PMCPMC8844381
OpenAlexW3213394397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.